|
[Sponsors] |
March 12, 2018, 11:01 |
Lagrangian simulation
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 357
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi All
Has anyone here worked with Lagrangian spray simulation. ? I have a doubt regarding the injector position in a nozzle. I have a flat spray nozzle which produces droplets and the outlet of the spray is having some shape and I am not sure how can i simulate this in lagrangian method to see the droplet formation and its size. Kindly have a look on the image and let me know if there is any possibility to do this. Thanks in advance. |
|
March 13, 2018, 01:51 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Because atomization does it more tricky. Other things like injector position, type of injectors and injector angles etc., we can deal with. But for the atomization part we used a table to specify velocity, position vector and sizes. If you are able to validate any a atomization model first then other things are not that hard. |
||
March 13, 2018, 21:20 |
|
#3 |
Member
Steve
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: South Korea
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello..
To tell you the truth.. I don't recommand to use spray simulation with star-ccm+.. Anyway, as ashokac7 said you should think about atomization. if spray velocity is fast (high weber number), you can validate break up tuning constants. But if your item has low spray velocity (low weber number, no break up or less break up), you have to test for using particle distribution and use RR curve.. I think these are important. (except clear condition) 1. Spray angle 2. Initial Particle size (related effective area) 3. Particle distribution. (example : RR curve..) 4. Injection rate Please keep in mind, spray simulation is not simple. You have to validate not only SMD, but also penetraion length.. In any case, test results are required.. |
|
March 14, 2018, 08:28 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 357
Rep Power: 14 |
Dear Steve Lee
Yes you are true, sprays and atomization with lagrangian is really hard. And regarding the weber number can we calculate from the free stream velocity or how is it ? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Control simulation to apply different fields with chtMultiRegionFoam | jmdf | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 29, 2016 08:05 |
restarting paused transient simulation using reactingFoam | JMDag2004 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | August 10, 2015 11:15 |
Particle Size in Lagrangian multiphase simulation | jhlee9622 | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | July 20, 2015 23:15 |
about Lagrangian Multiphase Simulation | jhlee9622 | STAR-CCM+ | 0 | March 18, 2015 02:38 |
How to force coalescence in Lagrangian simulation | Vinny | Siemens | 0 | December 19, 2007 06:34 |