|
[Sponsors] |
Trimmer Vs Polyhedral - Drastic fall in data for poly mesh |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 6, 2017, 12:27 |
Trimmer Vs Polyhedral - Drastic fall in data for poly mesh
|
#1 |
Member
Bharat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Delhi, India
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
i am comparing results for an HVAC system with different meshes(timmer and poly).with trimmer mesh the results are quite acceptable. on the otherside, i am not changing anything, like mesh settings, boundary conditions etc. coming to the results i am seeing a drastic fall in the data (avg. velocities, avg. pressure, mass flow rate etc.) collected for poly mesh. can anyone share ideologies what can possibly go wrong?
__________________
chapter 3: -crossing the threshold- |
|
October 12, 2017, 07:06 |
|
#2 |
Member
|
Hi Bharatt, you probably have a strong gradient (in velocity?) and your polyhedral mesh is not capturing it?
What part of the HVAC system are you modelling? Best regards, Guillaume TrampoCFD.com |
|
December 5, 2017, 07:45 |
poly is good
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
Interpolating Data onto a Uniform Mesh | wadeellis | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | November 2, 2015 17:58 |
[snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature | giulio.topazio | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | August 22, 2012 10:03 |
[Gmsh] 2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH | aeroslacker | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 12 | January 19, 2012 04:52 |