CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Guidance with unsteady cooling

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 25, 2017, 04:55
Post Guidance with unsteady cooling
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
patilsachin is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am simulating an unsteady cooling/quenching process.
I have an solid object at 1000K and the surrounding fluid domain at Room temperature.

I have created interfaces to do a CHT analysis.

The models for Fluid are : 3D, Liquid, Constant Density, Segregated Flow, Segregated Fluid Temperature, Laminar, Gradients, Implicit Unsteady

The models for solid are : 3D, Solid, Segregated Energy, Implicit Unsteady

The stopping criteria are : Internal Iterations : 12 ; Max. No. of Steps : 1000 ; Maximum Physical Time : 200s

When I run the simulation, I am observing no temperature change (distribution) across the CHT interface and domain

Am I missing anything? Kindly help
patilsachin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2017, 08:29
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
ashokac7's Avatar
 
Ashok Chaudhari
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 11
ashokac7 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ashokac7
Check your interfaces. Try to make automated contacts for interfaces. Use larger number of inner iterations at first.

Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using CFD Online Forum mobile app
ashokac7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2017, 02:30
Question
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
patilsachin is on a distinguished road
Thank Your for your reply.

The Interfaces have been set as contact interface yet I don't get any kind of distribution of temperature across the the domain
patilsachin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 1, 2017, 09:47
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
ashokac7's Avatar
 
Ashok Chaudhari
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 11
ashokac7 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ashokac7
Can't tell exact problem from here. May be there is some problem with set up. Or may be if flow velocity is more then very less time is available for heat to transfer across interface. But it should show some gradient after some time atleast. How much physical time have you ran your simulation.?
ashokac7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2017, 14:52
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
patilsachin is on a distinguished road
Thank You for the reply.

I understand the problem. I was running the simulation for too less of a time. Hardly few seconds.

But now I have encountered a new problem. The temperature drop is too less compared to experimental data. I am getting a drop of 100 degrees in 120 seconds while actual data shows a drop of around 500 degrees.

Any reason why that might be happening?
patilsachin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2017, 03:05
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
ashokac7's Avatar
 
Ashok Chaudhari
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 11
ashokac7 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ashokac7
Have you tried steady case first.. That really helps in understanding the problem.. There may be a problem with meshing, or boundary condition, or material property. Try to run steady case first.
ashokac7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2017, 11:25
Post
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
patilsachin is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your reply.

I have attached the attachments for steady and unsteady cases.

In case of steady case, the equilibrium is reached just after 20 iterations.

In case of Unsteady case, even after 2500 iterations ( 90 minutes), equilibrium is not reached.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Steady.jpg (30.1 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg Unsteady.jpg (67.7 KB, 14 views)
patilsachin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2017, 01:37
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
ashokac7's Avatar
 
Ashok Chaudhari
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 11
ashokac7 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ashokac7
Plz keep inner itarations more than 20 initially... Residual of any quantity should fall by order of e3 in same time step... If you are using same sim file then I don't think that there is problem with bc's or interfaces. Is results of steady case comparable with expt?
ashokac7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
conjugate heat transfer, cooling, implicit unsteady, quenching


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
guidance for unsteady DPM Mohsin FLUENT 0 August 17, 2010 22:07
About Cooling channel alefem FLOW-3D 1 May 28, 2010 12:15
Error with the unsteady flamelet Model Christoph_84 FLUENT 0 February 25, 2010 12:06
time step for unsteady film cooling simulation Janendra Telisinghe FLUENT 0 December 11, 2007 07:14
Passive cooling system for batch reactor Darek Main CFD Forum 0 September 30, 2003 06:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:22.