|
[Sponsors] |
Implementation of algebraic turbulent heat flux modells |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 21, 2016, 10:44 |
Implementation of algebraic turbulent heat flux modells
|
#1 |
New Member
Thomas
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello,
I am currently trying to implement the Daly & Harlow and the Younis et. al. modell for the turbulent heat flux in STAR CCM+. I want to use them in combination with the standart cubic k-epsilon turbulence model. In STAR CCM+ the turbulent heat flux is calculated with a turbulent Prandtl Number by default. To improve this calculation, I want to implement both models which I stated above. Therefore I first set the turbulent Pr-Number to a very high number (10E10) to supress the default term for the turbulent heat flux. Then I implemented the Daly & Harlow modell as a vector field function and chooses its divergence as a volumetric heat source in the energy equation. Unfortunately the calculations do not converge with these modells acting as enegry source terms. Unnatural high and low temperatures appear in the field and I can't gain a converged solution. I tried underrelaxing the energy and momentum equations, but that did not really help. Further, I tried to calculate the first 1000 iterations without the new source term and then switching it on slowly (by a blending function) but that did not help either. I enclosed a short PDF to illustrate my problem better and to show the relevant equations. Did anybody of you tried to do something similar and was succesfull ? I would really appreciate any help. Thanks. Best regards, Thomas |
|
December 21, 2016, 23:49 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
|
||
December 23, 2016, 08:15 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Thomas
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Unfortunately I can't asume constant desity in my case. |
||
December 23, 2016, 23:55 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15 |
I've had the same frustration when I found out it wouldn't work with the multiphase modeling. Best of luck!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Calculating heat flux | hugo17 | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 4 | May 27, 2015 13:47 |
Heat Flux Wall Boundary Confusion. | Joee | FLUENT | 1 | August 21, 2010 13:20 |
how to impose experimental dat as boundary conditi | Rogerio Fernandes Brito | FLUENT | 14 | November 25, 2008 06:47 |
Natural convection - Inlet boundary condition | max91 | CFX | 1 | July 29, 2008 21:28 |