CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Implementation of algebraic turbulent heat flux modells

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 21, 2016, 10:44
Default Implementation of algebraic turbulent heat flux modells
  #1
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Thomaslob is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I am currently trying to implement the Daly & Harlow and the Younis et. al. modell for the turbulent heat flux in STAR CCM+. I want to use them in combination with the standart cubic k-epsilon turbulence model.
In STAR CCM+ the turbulent heat flux is calculated with a turbulent Prandtl Number by default.
To improve this calculation, I want to implement both models which I stated above.
Therefore I first set the turbulent Pr-Number to a very high number (10E10) to supress the default term for the turbulent heat flux.
Then I implemented the Daly & Harlow modell as a vector field function and chooses its divergence as a volumetric heat source in the energy equation.
Unfortunately the calculations do not converge with these modells acting as enegry source terms. Unnatural high and low temperatures appear in the field and I can't gain a converged solution.
I tried underrelaxing the energy and momentum equations, but that did not really help. Further, I tried to calculate the first 1000 iterations without the new source term and then switching it on slowly (by a blending function) but that did not help either.

I enclosed a short PDF to illustrate my problem better and to show the relevant equations.

Did anybody of you tried to do something similar and was succesfull ?

I would really appreciate any help.
Thanks.

Best regards,
Thomas
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 1.pdf (106.3 KB, 38 views)
Thomaslob is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2016, 23:49
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15
lcarasik is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomaslob View Post
Hello,
I am currently trying to implement the Daly & Harlow and the Younis et. al. modell for the turbulent heat flux in STAR CCM+. I want to use them in combination with the standart cubic k-epsilon turbulence model.
In STAR CCM+ the turbulent heat flux is calculated with a turbulent Prandtl Number by default.
To improve this calculation, I want to implement both models which I stated above.
Therefore I first set the turbulent Pr-Number to a very high number (10E10) to supress the default term for the turbulent heat flux.
Then I implemented the Daly & Harlow modell as a vector field function and chooses its divergence as a volumetric heat source in the energy equation.
Unfortunately the calculations do not converge with these modells acting as enegry source terms. Unnatural high and low temperatures appear in the field and I can't gain a converged solution.
I tried underrelaxing the energy and momentum equations, but that did not really help. Further, I tried to calculate the first 1000 iterations without the new source term and then switching it on slowly (by a blending function) but that did not help either.

I enclosed a short PDF to illustrate my problem better and to show the relevant equations.

Did anybody of you tried to do something similar and was succesfull ?

I would really appreciate any help.
Thanks.

Best regards,
Thomas
I maybe terribly mistaken, but I believe Star-CCM+ has had a few newer forms of turbulent heat fluxes implemented in recent versions. Not sure if you can use it with the cubic std k-e, but it maybe what you're looking at. At the time I last looked, it was only available with single phase.
lcarasik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2016, 08:15
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Thomaslob is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcarasik View Post
I maybe terribly mistaken, but I believe Star-CCM+ has had a few newer forms of turbulent heat fluxes implemented in recent versions. Not sure if you can use it with the cubic std k-e, but it maybe what you're looking at. At the time I last looked, it was only available with single phase.
Yes, there is a modell that works with the std k-e but you can only use it for the case of constant density.
Unfortunately I can't asume constant desity in my case.
Thomaslob is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2016, 23:55
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15
lcarasik is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomaslob View Post
Yes, there is a modell that works with the std k-e but you can only use it for the case of constant density.
Unfortunately I can't asume constant desity in my case.
I've had the same frustration when I found out it wouldn't work with the multiphase modeling. Best of luck!
lcarasik is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 08:30
Calculating heat flux hugo17 OpenFOAM Post-Processing 4 May 27, 2015 13:47
Heat Flux Wall Boundary Confusion. Joee FLUENT 1 August 21, 2010 13:20
how to impose experimental dat as boundary conditi Rogerio Fernandes Brito FLUENT 14 November 25, 2008 06:47
Natural convection - Inlet boundary condition max91 CFX 1 July 29, 2008 21:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:22.