CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

RANS Turbulence Decay Variation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 13, 2016, 17:49
Post RANS Turbulence Decay Variation
  #1
New Member
 
Kyle
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
KGRAAT is on a distinguished road
I am a novice Star-CCM+ 10 user who has formal training in ANSYS Fluent. I am completing collaborative research into the free-stream effects on the heat transfer coefficient from a flat plate. The first step is to model and confirm turbulence decay in a rectangular fluid domain of 4x1x1 m.

The domain has been meshed using hexahedral solid elements of size h=0.02m. The front face is a velocity inlet with U=4m/s a turbulence intensity of 10% and an integral length scale of 100mm. The back wall is a pressure outlet and the four remaining walls are slip boundaries.

The k-e RANS model is to be used and confirmed against the power law decay model for grid generated turbulence. I have successfully used ANSYS Fluent to model the decay and have confirmed the results to be correct, but when I use the same parameters and the same model constants in Star-CCM+, I get a result with incorrect turbulence decay (see the graph attached comparing the correct ANSYS Fluent result with the Star-CCM+ result). The data has been extracted using a line probe of 200 points through the centre of the domain.

I have meticulously checked all the models, constants, the mesh etc. against my Fluent studies and have not found a reason why they are different; everything between them is the same except the solution methods. I have read through the Star-CCM manual, but still have been unable to understand why there is a difference.

Any help would be appreciated

Kyle
Attached Images
File Type: png FluentVSstarCCM.png (13.0 KB, 15 views)
KGRAAT is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
turbulence decay


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale rizhang CFX 2 April 22, 2016 08:22
decay of turbulence intensity littlelz CFX 3 May 16, 2014 17:44
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 10:52
Natural convection - Inlet boundary condition max91 CFX 1 July 29, 2008 21:28
turbulence modeling questions llowen Main CFD Forum 3 September 11, 1998 05:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:34.