|
[Sponsors] |
December 13, 2016, 17:49 |
RANS Turbulence Decay Variation
|
#1 |
New Member
Kyle
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am a novice Star-CCM+ 10 user who has formal training in ANSYS Fluent. I am completing collaborative research into the free-stream effects on the heat transfer coefficient from a flat plate. The first step is to model and confirm turbulence decay in a rectangular fluid domain of 4x1x1 m.
The domain has been meshed using hexahedral solid elements of size h=0.02m. The front face is a velocity inlet with U=4m/s a turbulence intensity of 10% and an integral length scale of 100mm. The back wall is a pressure outlet and the four remaining walls are slip boundaries. The k-e RANS model is to be used and confirmed against the power law decay model for grid generated turbulence. I have successfully used ANSYS Fluent to model the decay and have confirmed the results to be correct, but when I use the same parameters and the same model constants in Star-CCM+, I get a result with incorrect turbulence decay (see the graph attached comparing the correct ANSYS Fluent result with the Star-CCM+ result). The data has been extracted using a line probe of 200 points through the centre of the domain. I have meticulously checked all the models, constants, the mesh etc. against my Fluent studies and have not found a reason why they are different; everything between them is the same except the solution methods. I have read through the Star-CCM manual, but still have been unable to understand why there is a difference. Any help would be appreciated Kyle |
|
Tags |
turbulence decay |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale | rizhang | CFX | 2 | April 22, 2016 08:22 |
decay of turbulence intensity | littlelz | CFX | 3 | May 16, 2014 17:44 |
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 15, 2009 10:52 |
Natural convection - Inlet boundary condition | max91 | CFX | 1 | July 29, 2008 21:28 |
turbulence modeling questions | llowen | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 11, 1998 05:24 |