|
[Sponsors] |
Segregated converges, but coupled diverges... why? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 22, 2015, 10:12 |
Segregated converges, but coupled diverges... why?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11 |
Running an ground vehicle aerodynamic simulation and everything was fine until changed from SEGREGATED flow and energy to COUPLED flow and energy - then every simulation diverged, no matter what I tried (mesh improvements, different turbulence models, etc) ... until I switched back to segregated and it works again.
But why? Could it be the Mach number? (my simulation runs at M=0.175) (I tried coupled flow & energy because I wanted to try a freestream boundary condition on the roof and walls of the domain to simulate an open windtunnel, but the freestream option is unavailable for segreated flow in STAR-CCM+) |
|
December 29, 2015, 18:44 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
The coupled solver is density-based in STAR-CCM+, so it's difficult to get running with low speed flows.
You need to utilize and tweak the expert driver and get a good grid sequencing solution in the beginning. Also in my experience the coupled solver is more sensitive to poor meshes, so make sure your mesh is good quality. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Segregated or Coupled flow? | hamzamotiwala | STAR-CCM+ | 7 | October 25, 2011 20:35 |
enthalpy in segregated and coupled | naomi | FLUENT | 4 | August 2, 2007 07:47 |
switching from coupled solver to segregated | Oz | FLUENT | 2 | November 8, 2006 17:02 |
Segregated or coupled solver? | Nori | FLUENT | 0 | September 29, 2005 15:24 |
Segregated or coupled? | Pierluigi Allegro | FLUENT | 2 | September 26, 2000 00:51 |