|
[Sponsors] |
September 24, 2014, 22:22 |
Low Reynolds Number
|
#1 |
New Member
Isaac
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
Im doing a CFD analysis on a NACA 0012 wing, with a AR of 5.0 at a Re number of 80000. I am validating it with an experimental data. Im still unsure which model I have to be using , whether to go with laminar or use turbulent BL. When I have used , laminar model, the lift coefficients matched, but the drag coefficients are far way off. Experimental @ 5 degrees Cl - 0.4, cd -0.12. My analysis Cl -0.38, cd -0.06. Any help in helping me solve this, is deeply appreciated |
|
September 28, 2014, 21:28 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Gabriel Boucher
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 13 |
I guess you could use a low-Reynolds Turbulence model such as k-omega sst. Those are usually good for external aero purpose. That being said, in my experience I've found that it's always hard to match the drag values.
|
|
September 29, 2014, 03:30 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Isaac
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13 |
Iv tried that too, Iv played with the turbulence intensity and viscosity ratio too, still no avail , is there a limiting factor for Tu?
|
|
September 29, 2014, 18:50 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
What does your grid look like? That's more than likely the problem.
|
|
September 29, 2014, 19:04 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15 |
Could the Turbulence Suppression model help in this problem?
|
|
October 1, 2014, 15:21 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Isaac
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13 |
||
October 1, 2014, 15:22 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Isaac
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13 |
Yes, i have used Turbulence Suppression Model, but the answers still did not change. I am running this simulation in Star CCM+, and i used, SA model, and tried playing with turbulence viscosity ratio, the Cd value increased to 0.89, but I didnt see any major changes,
|
|
October 1, 2014, 17:45 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
You're doing LES for this?
|
|
October 2, 2014, 11:29 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Isaac
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13 |
||
October 2, 2014, 13:10 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
I thought the turbulent suppression model was for LES.
Anyway, can you show me the grid? |
|
October 3, 2014, 01:27 |
|
#11 | |
New Member
Isaac
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
|
||
October 4, 2014, 18:48 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
Your near-wall layers seem to be really coarse. What is your wall y+?
|
|
October 4, 2014, 23:10 |
|
#13 |
New Member
Isaac
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 13 |
I have kept it as 0.5
|
|
June 9, 2018, 06:12 |
same problem different issues
|
#14 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 14 |
hello Isaac
we're you able to resolve? in my case drag coefficient is captured with minimal error of 1-3% whereas lift coefficient is way off. any help or suggestions please |
|
Tags |
fluent, naca 0012, star ccm+, wing simulation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cluster ID's not contiguous in compute-nodes domain. ??? | Shogan | FLUENT | 1 | May 28, 2014 16:03 |
[blockMesh] --> foam fatal error: | lillo763 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | March 5, 2014 11:27 |
decomposePar pointfield | flying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | December 30, 2013 16:05 |
Low Reynolds number question | wildfire230 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | December 13, 2013 05:34 |
Unaligned accesses on IA64 | andre | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 23, 2008 11:37 |