CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Error in Co-Simulation using Abaqus

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 17, 2014, 06:15
Default Error in Co-Simulation using Abaqus
  #1
Member
 
Arun Krishnan.L.H
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 13
arun7328 is on a distinguished road
Dear Sir,
I am trying to model the dynamic response of a flexible barge, in head waves, for a number of wavelengths. I have successfully predicted the heave and pitch motion of the barge modelled as rigid body. I used overset mesh for this purpose. All the results are compared with results published in various references which have validated the motion and responses of this barge. I even have the experimental results of this flexible barge.

I am now trying to set up co-simulation using Star and Abaqus and I am having a few problems.

1. During my first trials, I used symmetry condition, and modelled only one half of the barge. I have used morphing motion, defined by co-simulation, for the barge, and the overset mesh is defined as floating. The barge is modelled as a beam (half beam) in Abaqus, the particulars of which are similar to that used for the experiments. I have compared the beam properties in .dat file with the actual one and it matches. Before performing a co-simulation, I had evaluated the dry natural frequencies of the beam and compared the same with the results (both in paper and Euler beam) and they match very well for the first 7 modes. To represent the wetted surface, I have defined the half barge as a dummy surface and used coupling constraints to attach the nodes of the surface to the beam. I defined a boundary condition at the end nodes of the beam element (X,Y translation =0 , X,Z rotation=0. I even released Z rotation in another model). When I coupled the fluid and structural model using an Implicit scheme, the simulation failed to run giving an error that 'Negative cells found. Please correct your mesh'. I think the problem is because of the symmetry boundary condition. I have run the Abaqus model alone using pressure load and it works fine. Is it possible to use symmetry condition and run co-simulation? If so could you tell me what could be going wrong. I have attached my Abaqus model snap shot of half beam model. I have used 4 node surface element.

2. I have then modelled the full barge and replicated the same in Abaqus. I have attached the beam model as a picture. Since I could not define the dummy surface for the barge when it was closed at the top, I deleted the surface and assigned it as surface ( I am not able to define a closed body as a dummy surface. Is it possible?). I changed from implict to explicit. Now when I set up co-simulation It gives very weird, large deformation. In head waves I expect the barge to only have vertical rigid body modes and deformations. I get horizontal bending and after a few time steps it again gives the same error. I have assigned the same end boundary conditions as mentioned above . Is this because I have deleted the top surface of the barge in my Abaqus model? I am thinking the error is because there is no top surface in Abaqus model, the fluid model is not able to morph that surface. Is that possible? I am exporting Static pressure from star and importing displacements from Abaqus. I am using a time step of 0.003 sec for both Star and Abaus and coupling step of 0.003 sec. I even tried a coupling step of 0.012 sec but it just takes longer to give the same error.

Could you please kindly guide me on this problem? I have tried many things (time steps, coupling steps, half and full mdoels etc)

Thanks
Regards
Arun
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Barge_half.jpg (54.9 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg Barge_full.jpg (40.3 KB, 31 views)
arun7328 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2014, 00:45
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25
me3840 is on a distinguished road
I don't think a symmetry condition is a good idea for this. Doesn't that limit your twisting modes?

Where do the negative volume cells occur?
me3840 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2014, 05:41
Default
  #3
Member
 
Arun Krishnan.L.H
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 13
arun7328 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by me3840 View Post
I don't think a symmetry condition is a good idea for this. Doesn't that limit your twisting modes?

Where do the negative volume cells occur?
Thank you for the reply. I also felt that symmetry is not good. May be it would be fine for vertical bending but not for twisting. I am now trying it on a full model. The negative cells occur in the overset mesh. After a few iterations the body twists in a weird way. Even when i run the simulation in calm water with the said BC's in structural model, I still get negative cells. I am having no clue as to why this is happening.

I have attached the picture of the iso surface. After a few time steps it distorts like in the pic and a few more it gives the error.

Regards
Arun
Attached Images
File Type: jpg overset.jpg (97.8 KB, 39 views)
arun7328 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Abaqus - Fluent Coupling WITHOUT MPCCI s.mishra FLUENT 1 April 5, 2016 07:47
Simulation of high pressure diesel injector - all phases compressible with cavitation fivos CFX 4 July 30, 2015 07:48
Solar Radiation in OpenFOAM plainstyle OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 15 July 8, 2014 05:43
Simulation of a complex wing in solidworks flow simulation niels1900 FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 6 April 20, 2011 11:44
clinching simulation with Abaqus Nick Main CFD Forum 2 March 5, 2002 03:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:29.