|
[Sponsors] |
Contact Resistance Mapping to simulate complex in body conduction |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 27, 2014, 06:01 |
Contact Resistance Mapping to simulate complex in body conduction
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
I ran a simulation of a cube with volumetric heat source and different heat conduction properties within each of its parts. I then wrote the boundary heat transfer and temperature values of the outer boundaries into a table (xyz). Using the maximum temperature within the cube I calculated a mean thermal resistance and added the result as a new table (xyz) to the outer shell as contact resistance. I hoped to see the same heat distribution as before, while I was using a cube made out of a single part. This did not really work out, there are some similarities but the temperature is way too low. Did I miss something? Can it work and I simply did something wrong, or can't this work at all? Thanks for your advices |
|
May 27, 2014, 19:28 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
I'm confused with your description. If there's just a single cube, where is the heat conducting to?
|
|
May 28, 2014, 05:35 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 12 |
I made some pictures to describe the setup.
The picture "whole_setup.jpg" shows the solid block in the middle of a fluid tube with a pressure outlet on both fronts of the tube. The block itself is made out of 5 pieces with the centerpiece defined as a volumetric heat source with 10000 W/m^3 and shown in picture block.jpg . I then ran a simulation and extracted the resulting boundary heat transfer and temperature on the "fluid-solid" interfaces into a csv file (shown in picture table.jpg). After that, I determined the maximum temperature within the centerpiece. Given equation1, I set Q to be the extracted boundary heat transfer at xyz, T1 to be the maximum temperature within the centerpiece and T2 to be the extracted temperature at xyz. I then rearranged the formula to look like equation2.jpg and removed the area A from it, as ccm+ is looking for a resistance value in the format shown in format.jpg . The results (for every xyz position) were then added to a new csv file (format: "thermal resistance,x,y,z") and read into a new simulation, which consisted of the same fluid part and a solid part made out of a single piece in the same position as the previous one. It is defined as a volumetric heat source with the same power, but due to higher volume, lower power density (2500 W/m^3). The thermal resistance was added as contact resistance at the solid-fluid interface. I hoped to see the same temperature distribution, I saw using different pieces with distinct thermal conductivities. But the results seem inverted. My question is: Can this actually work? What my I have done wrong? |
|
May 28, 2014, 05:36 |
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 12 |
This post is just for the second set of pictures
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
timeVaryingMappedFixedValue: large data mapping on complex inlet boundaries | vkrastev | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 7 | June 2, 2016 16:50 |
help with UDF for contact angle based on contact line velocity | gandesk | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 14 | October 29, 2012 14:58 |
Variable Thermal Contact Resistance | octavyo | CFX | 3 | March 13, 2011 12:11 |
handle thin material or thermal contact resistance | sven82 | OpenFOAM | 3 | February 21, 2011 08:43 |
Thermal contact resistance without meshing it? | rosco | FLUENT | 2 | June 30, 2003 18:50 |