CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

VOF wave getting damped.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 11, 2013, 08:07
Default VOF wave getting damped.
  #1
Member
 
Arun Krishnan.L.H
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 13
arun7328 is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

I am going to work on wave interaction on ships and the dynamic forces for various cases. Just to get the modelling and meshing right for VOF wave and to what comes out of the software for a user defined wave, I am simulating first order waves in a rectangular domain.

The domain is 75m(x), 10m(y which is the direction of wave height), 1m(z direction). The free surface is initialized so that the domain is equally divided. The coordinate of y axis of free surface is 0.

I have defined a wave of length 5 mts, current/wind velocity 1.5 m/s, amp 0.1 mts. The mesh sizes on the free surface is refined using a block of height 0.3 m. The x and z refinement are wavelength/80 and y axis is amp/20. Time step is wave period (2.4*80). I have run the simulation using 50 and 70 inner iterations but the nature of the pressure plot seems to be that of a damped oscillation. Though the waves are not becoming completely flat , which was an issue i had before, it gets damped a little. The point on water level of the wave is 0,0,0. The distance from the wave to outlet is 50mts.

I have also changed the VOF relaxation from 0.9 to 0.5 but there is no change. Can anyone please guide me regarding what is going wrong or what other parameter i could change. I am running unsteady, inviscid model and 1st order solver.

Thanks
Regards
Arun
Attached Images
File Type: jpg vof initial.jpg (9.5 KB, 226 views)
File Type: jpg vof after 4 sec.jpg (10.3 KB, 195 views)
arun7328 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2013, 09:34
Default
  #2
New Member
 
saeed barzegar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 14
saeed.barzegar.v is on a distinguished road
Dear Arun

I had a same problem. I suppose, you are working on old version of fluent? if it is true, you can follow another simple way (by new version of fluent (in ANSYS 13 or 13))
in ANSYS13-fluent, there are options for modeling wave (Airy, stocks,...) and free surface, but it takes times to realize. however, in this way you can simulate completely your problem.
my firs your problem was like "picture 1111" (likes your problem) and my result after modeling in new version of fluent is like "picture 2222" (that wave does not damp)

Also this link can help you for modeling wave in ansys-fluent: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...-modeling.html

I hope my suggestion will be helpful.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1111.jpg (38.6 KB, 177 views)
File Type: png 2222.png (3.8 KB, 155 views)
saeed.barzegar.v is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2016, 05:47
Default
  #3
New Member
 
merseyside
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Jenn is on a distinguished road
Dear saeed,

Would you please also share your experience with inlet and outlet settings?

Thanks a lot.
Jenn
Jenn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2017, 07:56
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Yi Theng Sea
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
SeaYiTheng is on a distinguished road
Dear Saeed

Hi I am trying to simulate waves too but it dampens out a lot over distance. I am using ANSYS version 16.2. Are you using UDF to generate waves? Can you share with me your UDF code? yithengs@gmail.com
Your help is very very much appreciated

Regards,
Yitheng
SeaYiTheng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2017, 14:05
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Dong Seo
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16
wester is on a distinguished road
Dear Arun,

I think your result doesn't looks like a wave damping issue. It looks like that there was not enough simulation time for getting the fully developed wave - the initial wave just starts propagating into the calm water area. It might be better to apply the initialization option to fill the whole domain with the wave.

If you don't want a current-wave interaction, start with the zero current/wind velocity.

Also, please check the wave period and length again. It doesn't match.

Regards,
Don
wester is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2017, 20:43
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Yi Theng Sea
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
SeaYiTheng is on a distinguished road
Dear Wester

Attached is the screenshot of the wave I generated, T=1 sec, A = 0.05m using UDF code. As you can see the damping issue is very serious where the wave just disappeared over the distance. Could you please share with me how could I solve the damping issues in my case?
Appreciate your help

Regards,
Yitheng
Attached Images
File Type: png Untitled.png (20.5 KB, 99 views)
SeaYiTheng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2017, 09:48
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Dong Seo
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16
wester is on a distinguished road
Hello SeaTiTheng,

Sorry for the late reply. I can't make sure what was the main damping source just based on the attached image. Frequently, the reflected wave on the outlet boundary might be one of the reasons. Usually, if possible, adding an extra domain (space) is recommended to resolve this wave reflection issue. Also, gradual changes in meshing size and additional numerical damping (or smoothing) is useful to suppress the unwanted wave reflections.

Cheers,
Dong
wester is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2017, 10:54
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Yi Theng Sea
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
SeaYiTheng is on a distinguished road
Hi Wester

Thanks for the reply! But i guess reflection might not be the issue here as what I am showing in the picture is the the first three waves that are generated from the moving wall on the right. The first three waves have not reached the left wall yet for reflection to occur i think. As you can see, the first wave is moving from the right to the left and the wave height reduces a lot compared to the waves on the right. Do you have any idea why this happens?
Do let me know if you need any more information on my setup. Appreciate your help

Regards,
Yitheng
SeaYiTheng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2017, 11:38
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Dong Seo
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16
wester is on a distinguished road
Hi SeaYiTheng,

What's the physical time of the attached image? You have to wait a sufficient time for the fully developed wave field. Assuming a deep water wave, (actually your case looks like an intermediate depth), phase velocity is 1.56 m/s, and group velocity is 0.78 m/s. So you can figure it out how much time needs for the fully developed wave field.

Also did you check if your wave input is valid? It seems like that the your wave input is not appropriate to obtain a very sinusoidal linear wave - not enough water depth and too steep wave profile.

Thanks,
Dong
wester is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2017, 14:10
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12
miladzabihi is on a distinguished road
hello, I hope your problem has been solved. however, I had the same problem, have you used turbulence models? damping may occurs due to turbulence models
miladzabihi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2017, 14:15
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12
miladzabihi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaYiTheng View Post
Hi Wester

Thanks for the reply! But i guess reflection might not be the issue here as what I am showing in the picture is the the first three waves that are generated from the moving wall on the right. The first three waves have not reached the left wall yet for reflection to occur i think. As you can see, the first wave is moving from the right to the left and the wave height reduces a lot compared to the waves on the right. Do you have any idea why this happens?
Do let me know if you need any more information on my setup. Appreciate your help

Regards,
Yitheng
hello, I hope your problem has been solved. however, I had the same problem, have you used turbulence models? damping may occurs due to turbulence models
miladzabihi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2017, 02:21
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 556
Rep Power: 20
ping is on a distinguished road
you can use laminar flow for simple wave modelling but this is not normally the issue - the key is to get the mesh parameters and time step correct within the wave and the free surface - the user guide is very specific about this so apply these rules carefully - Simulating Physics > Modeling Multiphase Flow > Modeling VOF Waves > VOF Waves Guidelines
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2017, 17:52
Default
  #13
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12
miladzabihi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ping View Post
you can use laminar flow for simple wave modelling but this is not normally the issue - the key is to get the mesh parameters and time step correct within the wave and the free surface - the user guide is very specific about this so apply these rules carefully - Simulating Physics > Modeling Multiphase Flow > Modeling VOF Waves > VOF Waves Guidelines
thanks for your prompt reply. actually i am using ansys fluent. my project is to study wave- structure hydrodynamic. I use implicit solver where courant number is not important. the problem is that changing mesh or time step sometimes cause wave damping in an identical case, especially when I put a structure in wave propagation direction. do we have any criteria for courant number? any help will be appreciated
Thanks
miladzabihi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2017, 03:50
Default
  #14
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 556
Rep Power: 20
ping is on a distinguished road
well thanks for wasting our time here and please have this discussion moved to the fluent stream
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2018, 04:19
Default
  #15
New Member
 
Laghouat
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
zaoui is on a distinguished road
I am doing a 2D simulation for wave propagation and my problem is that for the same wave parameters and the same setting the propagation in ANSYS-CFX is not the same as in ANSYS-FLUENT and it seems that in Fluent the wave decay .
I need your help please
u are welcome for more explanations
zaoui is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2018, 04:45
Default
  #16
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 556
Rep Power: 20
ping is on a distinguished road
well you have come to the right forum to get advice on how to do waves well but take a step backwards and start using the code more suited for any marine related model ie star
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2019, 16:06
Default 2. order implicit discretization
  #17
New Member
 
Moritz Graumann
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
morelix is on a distinguished road
Use the 2. order implicit time discretization. The first order implicit discretization causes the effect of wave damping. (At least in Star-CCM+)
morelix is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
vof method of wave height gtfeng STAR-CCM+ 2 June 8, 2013 03:32
VOF wave hydraulic STAR-CCM+ 4 August 16, 2012 12:55
5th Order VOF Wave miharbi STAR-CCM+ 3 May 2, 2012 06:51
VOF wave ymz_0308 STAR-CCM+ 0 October 25, 2011 00:26
HELP! UDF sinusoidal wave, VOF model, porous face! A8anato_psofimi FLUENT 2 November 10, 2009 15:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:37.