|
[Sponsors] |
January 18, 2013, 07:18 |
Escape mode in lagrangian
|
#1 |
Senior Member
siamak rahimi ardkapan
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 18 |
Hello every body,
I am using lagrangian multiphase model to simulate particles in indoor condition. the problem is that when I activate escape condition for any boundary the lagrangian does not work any more. Do you know what is the problem?
__________________
Good luck Siamak |
|
January 18, 2013, 15:27 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 21 |
Pretty unlikely, since the information you've given here is ... a little low. Could you please describe a bit more what your issue is? Especially what "does not work anymore" should mean? Steady, Unsteady? Other physics? Etc...
__________________
We do three types of jobs here: GOOD, FAST AND CHEAP You may choose any two! |
|
January 21, 2013, 04:39 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
siamak rahimi ardkapan
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 18 |
Dear Abdul,
I use steady simulation, K-epsilon, 3 dimensional. I want to remove from the system the particles that touch floor ( because they settle down on the floor). There is an option to use escape mode for the lagrangian phase, but when I activate escape mode, the lagrangian solver stops and iterations continue without giving any data for lagrangian. However I found another way to solve it. I specify the method to be Rebound. Then I put the coefficient to the amount Zero.
__________________
Good luck Siamak |
|
January 21, 2013, 04:44 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
siamak rahimi ardkapan
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 18 |
Dear Abdul,
I have another question. I have 20 parcels for 10000 particles. After finishing the iterations of Lagrangian solver Usually I have some parcels that reach the maximum sub-steps. Is the result reliable? The way of solving this problem is to increase the maximum number of sub-steps, but it will take a lot of time and the track file will be so big. Thank you in advance
__________________
Good luck Siamak |
|
January 21, 2013, 13:18 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 21 |
As always this depends on your specific case and your requirements in terms of accuracy, hence it's pretty hard to make any assumptions.
But in general I can tell you that you can't always avoid big files or long computing times just by saying "it takes too long for me and the files are so big". I mean, I know that you would appreciate when it would be much faster, as nearly anybody else. But some kind of simulation just takes some effort.
__________________
We do three types of jobs here: GOOD, FAST AND CHEAP You may choose any two! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Save images using Fluent in batch processing mode | dixitked | FLUENT | 8 | August 29, 2019 12:25 |
to run a replayfile in batch mode from UNIX | froztbear | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | May 13, 2014 08:00 |
Grid Check Fails in Parallel Processing Mode | askance | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 20, 2010 10:11 |
DPM model in parallel batch mode | Prashanth | FLUENT | 2 | March 6, 2009 07:54 |
Batch mode | swapnil | CFX | 5 | November 23, 2002 09:38 |