|
[Sponsors] |
April 27, 2008, 14:57 |
Do you like k-epsilon?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
personally I prefer RNG model. what about you?
Tokoda |
|
April 28, 2008, 05:14 |
Re: Do you like k-epsilon?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It depends on the model, but I use V2F
|
|
April 28, 2008, 07:45 |
Re: Do you like k-epsilon?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
RNG is a variant of k-epsilon model. So your question does not make sense.
|
|
April 28, 2008, 18:54 |
Re: Do you like k-epsilon?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think you'll find that real men use cubic.
|
|
April 29, 2008, 18:53 |
Re: Do you like k-epsilon?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
whoa so I'm a real men! Yeah...
a part this sentence...there is NOT a "best" turbulence model...the better you can choose depends on the phenomena that you must study...in presence of pressure gradients, swirl motions, curvature and similar I use k-eps CUBIC (standard)...but that's a choice...someone may prefer k-w SST if they want a "simple" model (linear) that accounts for pressure gradients... |
|
July 21, 2008, 06:33 |
Re: Do you like k-epsilon?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
here is for real people who're high of the gene pool and not for people who talk about a pint of Guinness in local Irish pub!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Epsilon | Phil | FLUENT | 1 | August 22, 2007 16:52 |
derivation of epsilon equation of k-epsilon model | Ricardo Rezende | Main CFD Forum | 5 | May 1, 2007 06:38 |
DPM and k-epsilon | Vix | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2005 04:44 |
k-epsilon? | tucker | FLUENT | 1 | May 14, 2005 01:56 |
K-Epsilon | Srivatsan V.R | FLUENT | 1 | March 24, 2005 02:30 |