|
[Sponsors] |
April 10, 2008, 13:16 |
transient calculations!
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hy, what can be changed or improved in mesh generation or boundaries conditions in order to increase the time step for the transient calculations? the biggest time step for which the calculations are not divergent after few iterations is 0.001s... thanx! lelia
|
|
April 10, 2008, 23:42 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can you please try to decrease the mesh size and see whether it works or else you have to check the boundary conditions again.. that is the best if you have to increase the time step.
Sachin |
|
April 11, 2008, 05:52 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hy! thankx for the advice...but can u be more explicit...by decreasing the mesh size u mean the number of cells or the cells dimensions? because i have around 200.000 cells but the smallest one has 0.0006m. then, for the boundaries conditions, i have an inlet and an outlet...i'am confused a bit...i appreciate if u give a more detalied explanation. thankx! regards,lelia
|
|
April 11, 2008, 12:15 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You have to decrease the mesh size. Refine your mesh. But this will cause increase in number of cells which will take more PC run time. Regarding boundary conditions, do check them again by plotting each and every boundary conditions. Even if you miss small thing it will diverge. Good luck.
Sachin |
|
April 11, 2008, 13:00 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thankx, just that i can't go bellow 0.0006m which is the smallest cell dimension, because i already have 270.000 cells...and for the boundaries conditions, i cant find the problem, if there any...im trying to solve the fluid flow in steady state and then just the particles ( because i have a 2 phase problem) in transient hopping that it will take less time and that the errors induced are acceptable.. regards, lelia
|
|
April 11, 2008, 13:50 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is ok if you can not reduce the mesh size for some of the cells. Try to refine the mesh whereever you can. I hope this helps.
Regards, Sachin |
|
April 11, 2008, 15:50 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If u are using ccm+ turn off volume sources, and hope for the best by refining your surface mesh
|
|
April 11, 2008, 16:36 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
no, i'am working under Star-Cd 3.26...but is there any chance to simulate in the same time the fluid flow in steady state and particles motion in transient?
|
|
April 13, 2008, 12:17 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No, it should be done in two steps. If you do uncoupled simulation (i.e. particle do not affect the flow) then you can first get a steady state solution for the flow without particles, afterwards add particles, turn off flow field solution and make a restart. In this case at the second step you'll have to solve only particle motion equations.
|
|
April 14, 2008, 09:33 |
Re: transient calculations!
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi Anton! you always have answers for my problems?! thankx a lot! in fact that's what i have done. first i considered just the fluid flow in steady state, then i have restarted the simulation using the steady state results and adding the particles and this time in transient state. i also turned off the solvers for fluid ( equation behavior - primary variables - u-mom,v-mom...). that's the idea, isn't it? thankx! regards, lelia
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient Flow, Transient Pressure in Work Bench | Erich | CFX | 1 | May 8, 2007 12:55 |
nox calculations | antonietta | FLUENT | 0 | September 7, 2005 10:55 |
y+ calculations | henry | CFX | 9 | June 27, 2002 21:48 |
file-size in transient calculations | John | FLUENT | 1 | February 12, 2001 16:13 |
Implicit transient calculations using Fluent5 | G. Berntsen | Main CFD Forum | 4 | November 10, 1999 16:32 |