|
[Sponsors] |
May 3, 2007, 04:37 |
Reaction model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Could anyone suggest, for diesel engine combustion simulation which mechanism is better?: 1 step or 3 step EBU model, and why? As I think, 3-step mechanism allows tracking of H2 which can be responsible for generating OH radicals. Like H2+O=OH+H and OH+H2=O2H+H. And usually looking at OH concentration flame structure can be determined. Can this be done in Star-CD?
Any comments would be appreciated Regards |
|
May 3, 2007, 07:23 |
Re: Reaction model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You have to keep in mind that you need to define your (empirical) constants A and B for each step in the EBU model, i.e. you have to tune your model to produce the right results. This is not too difficult for 1 step, but I could imagine that you can produce quite easily meaningless results with a 3-step mechanism.
I am not sure if the EBU model is the right tool to calculate the intermediate species in a combustion. you are probably better off with one of the higher reaction models. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gasification reaction model | Adi | FLUENT | 6 | July 3, 2013 00:39 |
Surface Reaction Model or Heterogeneous Rxn Model? | satheeskannan | FLUENT | 0 | September 2, 2008 19:55 |
How to use the competing reaction model in CFX 11 | NewCoalman | CFX | 0 | May 5, 2008 04:15 |
Reaction rate model | wang | FLUENT | 1 | April 16, 2002 07:57 |
help about chemical reaction model | lawrence | Main CFD Forum | 4 | February 26, 2002 04:06 |