CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens

Parameters of discretisation schemes

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 1, 2007, 10:34
Default Parameters of discretisation schemes
  #1
george
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello to everybody,

I have a question about the discretisation schemes. Firstly I used UD scheme for velocities and turbulence variables (standard high Reynolds k-e turbulence model) and 10000 iterations with maximum residual error 10E-05. My run stopped at 314 iterations (steady state). After I changed the scheme in LUD and number of iterations in 50000 without change anything else (e.g. Blending factors or sweeps or relaxation factors). My run went then in 50000 iterations and it did not converged. I do not understand which parameters usually we prefer to change (increase or decrease) in order to achieve the desired convergence (e.g. blending factors or sweeps or relaxation factors). Now I run the same case with the QUICK scheme, but I believe that it will not converge again due to the above reason (I do not change some parameters). Do someone can help me?

Thank you in advance

George
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2007, 12:03
Default Re: Parameters of discretisation schemes
  #2
sidd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
George,

There is no thumb rule for differencing schemes. It depends a lot on the kind of problem you are handling.

UD scheme being first order, usually converges without much problem, giving less accurate result. LUD being second order, take time for convergence. And QUICK is 3rd order, it may take more time.

As per my knowledge, you should try a lower blending factor, as this factor decides the mixing of higher order and lower order differencing.

But i can't say that this blending only may be the problem in your case.

Good Luck

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2007, 02:45
Default Re: Parameters of discretisation schemes
  #3
george
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Sidd

Thank you very much, I will begin firstly by decreasing the blending factor to investigate the character of the run.

George
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2007, 04:07
Default how to control the yplus value
  #4
kathir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi expert my problem is finding the heat transfer coefficient around the cylinder in a uniform flow. but i got the ypus value nearly .5 to 3. according to my theoretical knowledge for this yplus value k-e model overpredict the heat transfer. how to get the accurate heat transfer coefficient. but i cant provide the fine mesh in near walls because i want to find the boundary layer effects how to use wall functions for this kind of problem

by kathir
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2007, 03:29
Default Re: Parameters of discretisation schemes
  #5
siva
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What is CFD? Whee it is used?, What are the types of Algorithm and Advantages?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EP Anomalies and Discretisation Schemes Kevin Chow Phoenics 13 December 19, 2007 05:35
Discretisation sa FLUENT 0 March 8, 2007 08:19
High-order discretisation schemes Hu Phoenics 2 April 25, 2002 21:41
FEM discretisation for eps-equation Sigit Main CFD Forum 3 October 26, 2000 12:49
FV discretisation on tet meshes peter grafenberger Main CFD Forum 7 October 29, 1999 07:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45.