CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens

DNS semulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 1, 2006, 02:32
Default DNS semulation
  #1
denizen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can i semulate a DNS in Star-CD and how if a can?
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2006, 22:06
Default Re: DNS semulation
  #2
DB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Detached Eddy Simulation and LES are possible for sure and more details can be found in the user manual
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2006, 03:52
Default Re: DNS semulation
  #3
denizen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i know it, but DNS is not described in manual.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2006, 14:29
Default Re: DNS semulation
  #4
DB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Its not possible with STAR-CD

DB
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2006, 15:09
Default Re: DNS semulation
  #5
Ben
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Or with any comercial package for that matter, they just aren't set up for such accuracy

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2006, 02:44
Default Re: DNS semulation
  #6
denizen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you very much.

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2006, 10:09
Default Re: DNS semulation
  #7
Tim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
DNS is possible with STAR-CD. DNS is where you do not use any turbulence modelling, you resolve everything with the grid. Therefore, you run laminar (or LES: it depends).

The "correct" approach is to run laminar - DNS = no turbulence model = laminar. NB: a laminar setting means no turbulence model, it does not mean that whatever scenario you apply it to will/must be laminar. Obviously, the problem being that if your flow really is turbulent and you run true-DNS/laminar, you'd better have a very large computer!

Alternatively, you could run LES. Because the subgrid scale contributions from LES's turbulence model are dependant on the cell size (filter length), if you refine your mesh enough, you end with a DNS solution. The advantages of this approach being: 1. if your mesh is too coarse you'll get a better answer, as the subgrid scale model will do its job; 2. it's likely to be more stable - one significant benefit of using a turbulence model is that they tend to stabalise the calculation.

I have used STAR-CD with the second approach and obtained excellent results as compared with experiment.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 2, 2006, 03:56
Default Re: DNS semulation
  #8
Yacine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
To run a calculation in a so called DNS mode is possible. I just add one more option to the ones given by Tim. Run in LES mode but with the model constant=0.0 then you will even have the statistics computed for you. However, to say that is a valid DNS this can be an open debate mainly due to the numerical dessipation.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44.