|
[Sponsors] |
September 21, 2006, 14:01 |
rel-humidity hvac
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Greetings,
I want to model (passive) pollutant dispersion, and relative humidity distribution in a HVAC simulation. If I know the flux of water and pollutant from sources in the building and the relative humidity of the ambient air, how do I enter all this infomation as boundary conditions for the passive scalar equations of STAR-CCM+? Also, Is there any reason for having access to only one passive scalar model per simulation in this software? Thank you for helping! S |
|
September 25, 2006, 15:20 |
Re: rel-humidity hvac
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Humidity distribution is one of the most important variable in HVAC and air conditioning. Instead of a passive scalar you can start with a field function in the form:
W = A(T)/P + B(T) where A and B are functions of temperature, P is pressure and W is the water content. For example for building/room analysis: If you have humidity below 25% some kind of germs develops If you are above 45% some other kind of bacteries gets in The minimum bacterial/germs proliferation is around 35-40%. Why not use an active scalar as the density of vapor is smaller than the one of air? Some law can be found in the literature (journal, papers) and internet (search on google, yahoo) If you contact your local support office may be they can forward you a test case or an example. Good luck Donald |
|
September 26, 2006, 16:36 |
Re: rel-humidity hvac
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Donald,
Should I have small inlets (e.g. on top of persons head) in the domain issuing this water and pollutant flux in the solution? Is this whats generally done? Thank you, Regards. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
humidity | Son | FLUENT | 0 | October 7, 2008 06:06 |
Humidity | Nuno Leal | FLUENT | 0 | October 17, 2006 04:37 |
humidity | Milad | FLUENT | 0 | April 15, 2006 07:11 |
Humidity | rr | CFX | 1 | February 17, 2003 11:10 |
Air with humidity | Dan Sorensen | Siemens | 0 | February 10, 2000 09:53 |