|
[Sponsors] |
November 22, 2005, 23:58 |
under relaxation factor
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I am running a transient analysis with free surface. My run is diverging after some time, so I have reduced the time step. But this has very less effect on divergence. When I reduced the 'under relaxation factor for pressure correction' the run is running fine. But after some time it again diverged. So I reduced it further. So I just want to know how low I can go there? WHat is the effect. Thanks all |
|
November 26, 2005, 02:10 |
Re: under relaxation factor
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Normally under-relaxation factor should be between 0.8-1.0
DB |
|
November 28, 2005, 05:18 |
Re: under relaxation factor
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you case the convergence is difficult, then you could decrease the urf for pressure to 0.1 from default of (i think 0.3), and increase the urf of mom to 0.8 to 0.85. Further increase the pre and post iteration in AMG solver settings, this will keep the solver stable. If it does not help then check the skew of the mesh, the unstablity is due to this (most probably)
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what is under relaxation factor? | rayy | FLUENT | 30 | September 6, 2020 02:06 |
relaxation factor | adam | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 4, 2008 11:10 |
help in relaxation factor | SONALI | FLUENT | 5 | August 11, 2005 21:27 |
Under Relaxation Factor | AB | Siemens | 0 | November 29, 2004 14:56 |
Relaxation factor | Moon | Siemens | 1 | June 13, 2003 12:13 |