|
[Sponsors] |
July 18, 2005, 10:41 |
Unsteady Simulation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So we all know that Star's idea of unsteady calculation is a series of steady calculations with a time step. It also cannot handle meshes with cyclic boundaries that don't line up.
I am doing a unsteady calcualtion of a turbine vane-blade interaction. Due to the number of vanes and blades, the LCM of the two would be to model half of the entire arc. That would be 10x10^(a really big number) cells; this is far too many, even with 10 nodes of processor. I am squishing two blades to fit into one vane (because they are close) by fixing the mass flows. This process used to be done a lot in the old days. Any ideas of how to do this would help. |
|
July 19, 2005, 07:19 |
Re: Unsteady Simulation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just a note that STAR-CD can handle non-matching cyclic boundaries ages ago.
|
|
July 19, 2005, 22:31 |
Re: Unsteady Simulation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there anything special that i need to do besides set the time step and turn on the transient analysis?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unsteady state simulation | ashish | FLUENT | 0 | February 25, 2007 00:32 |
Unsteady simulation convergence | Tomislav | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 6, 2006 08:53 |
unsteady simulation airfoil | ramin | FLUENT | 8 | September 14, 2005 20:56 |
steady or unsteady simulation | philippe | FLUENT | 3 | May 7, 2003 07:01 |
Procedure to run unsteady simulation? | STN | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 16, 2002 05:37 |