|
[Sponsors] |
April 28, 2005, 02:05 |
Regarding Turbulence-Reynolds Number
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
when dealing with Engine Intake flows Why genenally people will prefer"K-E/High Re.number"option why not "K-E/Low Re.no"option. What will happen if we use "K-E/Low Re.no"option. Kindly explain me |
|
April 30, 2005, 00:22 |
Re: Regarding Turbulence-Reynolds Number
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
for "K-E/Low Re no. u hav 2 use two layer model tht is not compatible to er case. Not in engine intake flows but most of cases use K-E/High Re.number.
|
|
May 1, 2005, 12:26 |
Re: Regarding Turbulence-Reynolds Number
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In my opinion is more to do with the grid !!! if you are using hi-Rey number then the fist cell at the wall should be placed at y+ around 30 to 100 if you use low-Re model then y+ need to be a unity at the wall Hi-Rey model use a wall function while Low-Rey doesn't. two-layer models are simplified version but still you need to refine the grid with these ones too for more info check the manual.
|
|
May 2, 2005, 01:01 |
Re: Regarding Turbulence-Reynolds Number
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Low-Re models will invoke more detail and accurate calculations near the wall at the expense of pre & processing time. However, the details obtained may not be relevant to engine intake case where pressure drag/loss is of interest and not skin friction. Maybe that's why more people use hi-Re for this flow case.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cell reynolds number and turbulence | Gavrilo Bozovic | Main CFD Forum | 2 | December 11, 2018 04:13 |
Turbulence model for low Reynolds number flow? | Nokadu | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 26, 2013 12:42 |
Reynolds number | sisir | FLUENT | 1 | August 18, 2008 13:43 |
Turbulence Model for low Reynolds Number | Muhammad Shakaib | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 3, 2006 16:42 |
turbulence model for low Reynolds Number | Muhammad Shakaib | FLUENT | 0 | July 3, 2006 09:03 |