|
[Sponsors] |
Calculation uncertainty v.s. Adaptive refinement |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 8, 2004, 22:35 |
Calculation uncertainty v.s. Adaptive refinement
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all
I am doing simulation of flow inside a very complex geometry using STAR V.3.2. There can be a question such that how my calcultion is close to exact real flow conditions. In other words, how large is the uncertainty of my calcultion. In order to give an answer to this, CFD engineers need to examine mesh dependency on the results. The engineers will increase cell number by double or triple to conclude that the results are almost free from error due to mesh size. In this regard, I think adaptive cell refinement is a good alternative. How do you think? If you also think so, What criteria (i.e., 10% top gradient) do you suggest? Jihwan |
|
December 9, 2004, 04:26 |
Re: Calculation uncertainty v.s. Adaptive refineme
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is an error estimator in star which you can use.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Non constant viscosity and adaptive mesh refinement | srinath | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | June 14, 2008 04:18 |
v4 can do auto-adaptive refinement? | azmir | Siemens | 5 | June 18, 2007 11:40 |
smooth adaptive grid refinement | Wouter Harteveld | FLUENT | 0 | November 10, 2005 12:21 |
Adaptive refinement for arbitrary cells | jdc | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 7, 2003 13:41 |
Hints on adaptive mesh refinement | Bo Jensen | Siemens | 0 | July 17, 2000 09:39 |