|
[Sponsors] |
June 17, 2004, 04:52 |
Which is faster, distributed or shared data?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello all.
I use starHPC on 4 node linux machines. Master node has a 120Gb hard disk and 2Gb memory, and each slave node has a 40Gb hard disk and 2Gb memory. Each node communicates by mpich through 1000Base-T ethernet. NFS is used to share user's data on master node. I can choose distributed data and shared data, but I don't know which should I use. Does anyone know which is better(faster),distributed or shared data? Thanks advance. |
|
June 17, 2004, 04:55 |
Re: Which is faster, distributed or shared data?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, I am not an expert. But I think you'll get much better performance with distributed data on a cluster, because traffic through network will be bottleneck for performance.
|
|
June 17, 2004, 17:36 |
Re: Which is faster, distributed or shared data?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Distributed data will be faster. That way you are not tieing up the ethernet with I/O while you are running the job. Then the ethernet can be dedicated to message passing and all the I/O occurs only at the start and end of a run.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
near wall faster | azmir | Siemens | 0 | December 26, 2007 20:36 |
Making program run faster | Konstantinos | Siemens | 9 | March 8, 2006 12:58 |
Fortran 90 faster than C/C++ | B. R. Guirguis | Main CFD Forum | 48 | March 6, 2006 14:49 |
MicroTunnel V1.2 - Now 6x faster! | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 19, 2001 00:34 |
more RAM or faster CPU?? | Fabrizio Grieco | Siemens | 11 | January 23, 2001 08:35 |