|
[Sponsors] |
September 9, 2003, 01:32 |
mass flow rate at different cross section !!
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When we get the mass flow rate from different cross section in a flow field, they are different. Are they not mass conservation? How will you explain it?
|
|
September 9, 2003, 07:10 |
Re: mass flow rate at different cross section !!
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
must be same, when you do not have any sources/sinks. how did you obtain the mass flow rate?
|
|
September 10, 2003, 00:10 |
Re: mass flow rate at different cross section !!
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is no rule that says mass flow rate must be the same through any cross-section in the interior of the domain. The sum of mass flow rates must only be zero when taken from ALL domain BOUNDARIES.
|
|
September 10, 2003, 02:20 |
Re: mass flow rate at different cross section !!
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you are absolutely right - it depends on the geometry! when you have a straight pipe with one inlet and one outlet the mass flow rate is equal in every cross section. I just considered an too easy problem.
|
|
September 10, 2003, 02:46 |
Re: mass flow rate at different cross section !!
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
err...to be more precise, it depends on the flow field... imagine taken cross-sections parallel to and perpendicular to the streamlines.
|
|
September 10, 2003, 13:38 |
Re: mass flow rate at different cross section !!
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Draw a control volume around any part of your simulation. Now if you take the sum of the mass flows through that control volume and add any sources/sinks, they must equal zero.
If the two planes you created cut through the entire flow (ie. there are only walls between them and no other inlet/outlets/passages) and there are no sources/sinks, the mass flow rates should be equal. If they are not, either your solution is not converged or your post-processor is introducing interpolation errors (if it uses ip mass flows, the results should be exact). Although mass flows should equal across all boundary conditions, this is not sufficient a conservation criteria as the solver may be enforcing mass flow conservation at the boundary to accelerate convergence in the computational domain. Regards, Robin |
|
September 11, 2003, 16:38 |
Re: mass flow rate at different cross section !!
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Even a pipe flow does not have equal mass flow in any section at one time-step or iteration if the flow is compressible and transient. You have to look for the time averaged values.
|
|
September 15, 2003, 13:13 |
Re: mass flow rate at different cross section !!
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If the flow is compressible and transient, you will have to account for the accumulation of mass within the control volume, but mass is still conserved.
-Robin |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monitor flow through a cross section inside domain | Kushagra Mittal | CFX | 4 | August 5, 2008 23:40 |
Cross-Section | sidd | Siemens | 2 | March 10, 2008 05:14 |
CFX:getting mass flow rate across a cross section | allamaprabhu | CFX | 1 | February 14, 2006 13:07 |
How to get volume flow rate of a section? | Nyquist | Siemens | 1 | September 14, 2003 01:27 |
variable cross-section | Zsolt Ulbert | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 15, 2003 08:59 |