|
[Sponsors] |
July 23, 2003, 02:39 |
STAR Vs. Vectis
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
We r evaluating STAR+ICE Vs. Vectis. Can body throw more light on how they compare for port flow design and combustion specially for two stroke engines. |
|
September 3, 2003, 11:37 |
Re: STAR Vs. Vectis
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Forget using Vectis for 2 stroke engines. It requires an owful way to treat port opening/closing due to the way it moves and deforms the in-cylinder mesh. I am using STAR to simulate 2stroke engines and it is much better than Vectis: you have full control on mesh, more solver options and a fully customizable postprocessing. Good luck Roadracer
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
vectis | Emanuele | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 23, 2010 11:46 |
K-Epsilon model inside VECTIS | Ilomem | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 24, 2008 00:53 |
Vectis Heat Transfer | Fab | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 1, 2008 14:04 |
Vectis mesh format | Franjo | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 5, 2006 05:01 |
Ricardo Vectis Users? | Donald H. | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 10, 2002 03:10 |