 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
February 24, 2003, 08:04
|
question on cyclic B.C. for temperature
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Star-CD User Guide states that for a pair of partially cyclic boundaries, the temperature specification on the outlet side is not needed. This is understandable because the outlet temperature profile can be derived if the thermal boundary conditions are complete.
In my situation, however, the outlet side temperature restraint is a must in order to make the thermal bounday conditions complete. Therefore my question comes: does STAR use the T_bulk value if I specify it on the outlet side of the pair of the cyclic (partially) boundaries? It seems it won't by default but I am not 100% sure. Please experts here verify this to me. If it is true, how I can twist the default behavior of STAR to take the value? Many thanks, Jiaying |
|
|
||
|
February 27, 2003, 07:13
|
Re: question on cyclic B.C. for temperature
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Anyone could give me suggestion on this, please?
|
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Changing Temperature in Cyclic patch | panara | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | March 30, 2011 12:28 |
| question about a temperature dependent HTC | Christoph Ley | Phoenics | 2 | June 5, 2008 10:05 |
| Question about bcdefw.f for wall temperature bc. | Jimmy | Siemens | 10 | March 18, 2008 16:28 |
| Question about the resistance in fixed temperature | oniboy | Siemens | 0 | February 29, 2008 00:00 |
| Question on Face Temperature Gradient | Tomasz Didenko | FLUENT | 1 | June 27, 2003 05:30 |
Linear Mode
