|
[Sponsors] |
January 30, 2003, 08:25 |
ABL/grid/model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear StarCD users,
I try to study flow around square cyninder with a commercial code (k-epsilon) ..... and i've got some problems. This square cylinder is in atmospheric bounary layer and i found some correlations for neutal ABL : wind speed V=u_tau/kappa*ln(z/z0) Turbulence Intensity I=1/ln(z/z0) Lenght Scale = f(z,zg,z0,zc) (Harris JWEIA 1986) Re = 4.10^4 First, I see that lot of authors use It= constant and Lenght Scale = constant on vertical profil at boundary layer. Witch modelisation is good? Correlation or constant? Second, i see that lot of authors use power law : U=Uref(z/ref)^alpha but in the book "Boundary layer Meteorology (Stull)" log law is used to modelise wind speed profil. I know that log law is equal to power law for Re~10^5 and alpha=1/7 but witch profil is good to have got a good modelisation? Third, Witch grid near wall???? With log law, V=0 for z=z0, i want to use a two-layer turbulence model but how can i generate mesh? Betheen z=0 and z=z0 and for z>=z0 ??? Witch k and epsilon i can take for 0<=z<=z0? Thanks a lot for your answers ...... |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
why first grid point is at log layer in ke model | student | Main CFD Forum | 6 | May 13, 2007 13:25 |
Smagorinsky Sub-grid Model | Craig Johansen | CFX | 1 | October 13, 2004 04:10 |
ABL/grid/model | Alain B. | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 30, 2003 07:22 |
Grid independence with k-eps model | Mark Render | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 21, 2002 10:54 |
Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain | Robin Sanderson | Main CFD Forum | 6 | September 3, 2001 10:08 |