|
[Sponsors] |
Theorical pressure drop Doesn't match numerical. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 15, 2002, 07:27 |
Theorical pressure drop Doesn't match numerical.
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm in a big trouble uhhmmm...! I want to know the pressure drop in a 2D channel (1mm height, 30mm length) Air is the gas, Vinlet is .335m/s isothermal, laminar, steady state flow... I calculate the pressure drop by the formula:
delta p= (32 V L mu)/d**2 and it gives me 5.82 Pa Numerical gives me 2.267. Anybody know the origin of mismatching? Can anyone try to do this simple calculation to compare my results? thank's a lot |
|
April 15, 2002, 08:37 |
Re: Theorical pressure drop Doesn't match numerica
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I do not know about the equation you are using to compare with the computed result but remember to compare only the fully developed part of your channel flow. I think there is no data available for the pressure drop during the developing phase of the flow. Additionally, you should have dense enough grid (y+ ~1) near the wall. You can also make the developing phase shorter if you make the mesh initially more dense. Also, remember to make to grid long enough so that the section you are comparing with is not interfered by the outflow (or the inflow).
|
|
April 15, 2002, 09:48 |
Re: Theorical pressure drop Doesn't match numerica
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thank's but everything you suggest to me i made... the flow is fully developed cause i use L/h =30 I think the grid is ok (24x100) structured... Any advise? can you send me some rough calculation for this problem? thanks
|
|
April 15, 2002, 11:30 |
Re: Theorical pressure drop Doesn't match numerica
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
July,
I get 2.34 Pa, along 30mm fully developed. The problem is that the equation you are using is wrong, from Massey pp 160ish "Steady Laminar Flow Between Parallel Planes" gives dp/dx = -12*MU/C**2 which gives delta P = 2.18286 for this problem, which is about right.... All to easy to blame the CFD don't you think. Cheers B. |
|
April 15, 2002, 11:41 |
Re: Theorical pressure drop Doesn't match numerica
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry should be
dp/dx = -12*U*MU/C**2 You can do fully developed flow calcs with just two cells in the downstream direction, pressure boundary for inflow and a fixed flow mass outlet for outflow (chosen to give correct mean velocity). The profile you get at inflow is automatically fully developed. B. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What type of pressure can give the pressure drop | david | FLUENT | 1 | February 17, 2014 12:51 |
Theorical question | Gui | CFX | 3 | August 3, 2007 14:54 |
Pressure drop | Hugo | FLUENT | 1 | November 19, 2003 18:43 |
pressure drop | atholl | FLUENT | 2 | February 2, 2001 16:43 |
UDF in Fluent to Match Mass Flow at Pressure Outlet | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 29, 1999 11:44 |