CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens

Cyclic or Symplane?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 12, 2001, 05:00
Default Cyclic or Symplane?
  #1
Julie Polyakh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm solving an axsisymmetric problem: 6-degrees sektor with 2D mesh (1 cell in the theta-direction). Should I use cyclic or symplane boundaries?
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2001, 05:25
Default Re: Cyclic or Symplane?
  #2
john
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's safer to use cyclic boundaries for two reasons: 1. if you have swirl, you have to use cyclic; 2. since STAR solves velocity components in Cartesian coordinates, if x-y (u-v as velocity)is in the r-theta plane and z (w) is axis, you will have both u and v velocity components (then you have to use cyclics) unless you put your case between -3 and 3 degrees (or other positions where either u or v is zero).
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2001, 05:27
Default Re: Cyclic or Symplane?
  #3
Allan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I think that if the flow is swirling (The velocity component in the circumferential direction is not equal to zero), you should use cyclic boundary conditions. Otherwise, I believe that symmetric boundary conditions should be ok. Regards Allan
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cyclic boundaries gosia stein Siemens 5 June 13, 2007 08:39
Solid cells on symplane boundaries samu Siemens 7 May 29, 2006 11:07
cyclic conditions Laurent FERRY Siemens 0 January 6, 2006 16:11
Cyclic Boundary furkan Siemens 1 November 28, 2005 10:12
Symplane bc Julie Siemens 3 August 30, 2004 08:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:02.