|
[Sponsors] |
August 30, 2001, 14:20 |
User specified k-e model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everyone,
I use StarCD to model laminarising flow in a heat exchanger, and I would like to implement a low Reynolds-number k-e model through the sorkep.f and vistur.f routines. However, when specifying the use of the subroutine for turbulent viscosity vistur.f, the equations for k and epsilon are somehow inactivated. Unfortunately it is not possible to reactivate epsilon. Does user-specification of the entire turbulence model require special settings I may not be aware of? I would greatly appreciate your advice, Jasper Ps: It would of course be possible to implement k and epsilon using scalars (and have better control on k-e boundary definition), but that would exclude the use of cyclic boundaries. |
|
August 31, 2001, 12:38 |
Re: User specified k-e model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
look here: http://www.stanford.edu/~gmedic/cooling.html
|
|
September 5, 2001, 06:08 |
Re: User specified k-e model
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks, I have spoken to Jeong Min Seo. I hadn't realized switch 12 alone invoked vistur.f (Usefull, if you do not want Star to default to VIST = 0.01*VISM in laminarising flow),
Cheers, Jasper |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
User Defined Real Gas Model | john | FLUENT | 1 | October 25, 2012 15:05 |
Wall Treatment of User defined Turbulence Model | Yang Chung | FLUENT | 0 | August 23, 2008 12:31 |
Casson Viscosity model as one user define function | Zahra Rahmdel | FLUENT | 0 | November 6, 2004 06:53 |
User viscosity routine and user scalars? | Jeff | Siemens | 3 | January 6, 2003 06:26 |
Problem With User-Defined Fan Model Panel | neihad | FLUENT | 0 | November 25, 2001 18:21 |