|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When you don't apply a boundary condition to a boundary, it will automatically be defined as a wall (boundary 0 - Wall). Did anybody notice that if you explicitly define those boundaries as walls, that the convergence of the solution is changing drastically? Why is that?
Nijso |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can alter the definition of the default wall boundaries by redefining region 0 and you can also change the wall properties of any defined wall by defining the appropriate region number (RDEFINE command). Are you absolutely sure that the walls you defined have exactly the same properties as the default walls?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have a convergence problem, but I have not noticed this. What is your version? Is it for pc or unix? I'll try some cases.
Giovanni |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm running on Sun/solaris, version 3.101 It seems that it does not do this in general, I tried some other simple configurations. I'm doing a simulation with 2-D axisymmetric flow with swirling inlet conditions, the inlet is about 1/2 the radius of the pipe.With this configuration, it's convergence is different. I have not isolated the exact source of the problem yet... Nijso
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use wall function on some walls (not all walls) | Mahdi10 | FLUENT | 1 | February 16, 2009 11:52 |
HTC for low Y+ walls | Tang | FLUENT | 0 | March 15, 2007 15:55 |
too many walls?? | matze | Siemens | 2 | March 1, 2006 07:13 |
STAR CCM+ Defining problem | tn | Siemens | 2 | February 9, 2006 10:22 |