|
[Sponsors] |
March 2, 2001, 14:49 |
negative scalars !
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I observe very often in transient engine runs that I have negative scalar values for the injected fuel, CO2, and H2O ! This, of course, does not stabilize the runs... I use the switch 78 to eliminate them but I think it does not help. Any comments or suggestions ? |
|
March 5, 2001, 08:45 |
Re: negative scalars !
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
are you using mars or ud to solve the scalers? I've had problems with scalers > 1 using mars, ud appeared to clear it. Also what are your inlet boundary conditions? If they are fixed mass try fixed velocity.
|
|
March 5, 2001, 10:09 |
Re: negative scalars !
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Try using constant 64: Setting rcon 64 to 1 clips the scalars between 0 and 1 for density calculation only, rcon 64 2 additionally clips the scalar values. (This seems to work only for active scalars.)
|
|
March 8, 2001, 15:36 |
Re: negative scalars !
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your suggestions.
I do not have an inlet or outlet. To change from MARS to UD is maybe not so good because then you also decrease the accuracy of your solution. Stefan, do you mean that the rcon 64 2 clips active scalars that are transported ? I.e. scalars defined as 'off' are not clipped ? Regards, Ossi |
|
March 9, 2001, 02:14 |
Re: negative scalars !
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I had a passive scalar and it was not clipped. I switched to active, and then it worked.
|
|
March 13, 2001, 14:51 |
Re: negative scalars !
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I currently use the rcon 64 2 but it still give me warnings all the time in the *.info file that some of the scalars have values less than zero !?? (WARNING #009 ***THE VALUE OF SCALAR SC4 IN CELL 30609 ( -3.2635E-05) IS BELOW THE MINIMUM ( 0.0000E+00) )
I wonder why is it not working ? Regards, Ossi |
|
March 13, 2001, 15:33 |
Re: negative scalars !
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I just figured out that it might be that only the Transported scalars are limited between zero and one. The scalar I mentioned in the earlier mail was Active but not Transported (it was Internal).
Consequently, I wonder how could I limit the Internal scalars (which are Active) ? Regards, Ossi |
|
March 14, 2001, 02:26 |
Re: negative scalars !
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry, I don't know. You should call the CD hotline.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Units of scalars | Ipshita Chakraborty | FLUENT | 1 | May 17, 2006 10:12 |
scalars of different phase | novice | Siemens | 0 | August 27, 2004 06:09 |
passive scalars | CMB | Siemens | 2 | February 16, 2004 10:46 |
Passive Scalars | CMB | Siemens | 2 | January 15, 2004 09:27 |
passive scalars | CMB | Siemens | 0 | December 10, 2003 07:14 |