|
[Sponsors] |
October 25, 2000, 12:02 |
relaxation factors
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How do relaxation factors affect calculations? If I use values that are lower than default ones, is my solution "less real"?
thank you in advance Roberto |
|
October 25, 2000, 12:35 |
Re: relaxation factors
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The relaxation factors only affect the convergence history, not the final results. The purpose of under-relaxation is to make variable changes less rapidly so that the solution is more stable.
|
|
October 26, 2000, 11:40 |
Re: relaxation factors
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I know that this could seem a stupid question, but wouldn't it be easier just to set a very very low relax. fact. like 0.1? I'm very interested in this topic.
Thanks, Roberto |
|
October 26, 2000, 12:35 |
Re: relaxation factors
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, you can do that. It's a balance between stability and computing time. If you set very low under-relaxation factor, the solution changes very little by each iteration and it will takes ages to get convergence. The best values should be as close to one as possible while maintaining solution stability.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Relaxation factors | Vidya Raja | FLUENT | 7 | September 26, 2006 21:00 |
Under relaxation factors for LES | Dinesh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 26, 2006 07:25 |
Under relaxation factors box... Help ! | Cyril | FLUENT | 8 | October 28, 2005 01:16 |
Relaxation Factors | Tim | Phoenics | 3 | June 30, 2004 03:03 |
relaxation factors | zhujianguo | Phoenics | 1 | August 5, 2003 07:17 |