|
[Sponsors] |
December 30, 1999, 17:56 |
SAMM meshing
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have been a user in the past of Fluent and CFX. Both of those packages have had decent pre-processing capabilities. Presently, we are looking to use STAR-CD for our CFD work. I am planning on creating my geometry with Pro-Engineer and meshing the geometry with SAMM. I have some fairly sizeable differences in scale (axial vs. lateral) that SAMM will have to handle. Does this approach seem plausible? In either case, what suggestions can be made to improve the approach? The key here is to maximize throughput for parametric type studies without sacrificing too much in terms of mesh acceptability.
Thanks in advance. |
|
January 1, 2000, 11:56 |
Re: SAMM meshing
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
The other option of meshing for STAR CD is to use the pre-processor supplied by ICEM CFD ENGINEERING via Star CD. The grids can be exported to STAR, Fluent and CFX. They have a site at; www.icemcfd.com Hope this helps regards David |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:09 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:08 |
samm vs. ICEM | Lars Ola Liavåg | Siemens | 7 | October 17, 2000 11:04 |
SAMM users | Bart Prast | Siemens | 1 | August 24, 2000 05:34 |
Any comment on SAMM? | Quazi | Main CFD Forum | 4 | December 2, 1999 18:29 |