|
[Sponsors] |
June 3, 2015, 10:23 |
Physics models for turbulent 2D DNS
|
#1 |
New Member
Oliver Westbrook-Netheton
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
I am currently trying to capture the Von Karman street behind a static 2D cylinder at a Reynolds number of 200. At this Reynolds number, the wake its turbulent (http://www.thermopedia.com/content/1...FLOW_OVER_FIG2), I have already simulated the same problem at a Reynolds number of 80 and got good results back.
For this, I selected the same physics models within Star-CCM+ as are stipulated in the Incompressible tutorial for capturing the vortex shedding. Now that the flow is turbulent, I need to select the 'Turbulent' option instead of Laminar but want to implement a DNS. This requires no models for turbulence, but Star-CCM+ will not let me run the simulation without one. How do I chose the appropriate physics models to implement a '2D DNS'? Many thanks. |
|
July 7, 2015, 14:14 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,754
Rep Power: 66 |
To do DNS, just choose 2D laminar
|
|
Tags |
dns, physics models, star-ccm+, von karman street |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to set periodic boundary conditions | Ganesh | FLUENT | 15 | November 18, 2020 07:09 |
Eddy Viscosity Models and Reynolds Stress Models | JuPa | CFX | 1 | August 20, 2013 19:56 |
Cylinder Mesh and Physics models! | James88 | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | February 29, 2012 07:35 |
Multiple Physics Continua | boathead | STAR-CCM+ | 6 | December 4, 2011 13:33 |
Integrating data-driven and Physics bases models | rakesh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 23, 2004 06:31 |