CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > REEF3D

Problems obtaining correct Scouring vs. Time graph.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 25, 2024, 05:13
Default Problems obtaining correct Scouring vs. Time graph.
  #1
New Member
 
Kaushik Majumdar
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Kharagpur, India
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 2
Kaushik15 is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I am trying to validate the results obtained through REEF3D with the experimental results for monopile scouring. I am able to compare the final S/D value obtained at equilibrium. However, I am having trouble getting the correct scouring vs. time graph.

I have observed that the morphological solver is decoupled and by default runs at a maximum timestep of 10 seconds for every 10 iterations of the hydrodynamic solver. How do I get a time-accurate representation of scouring (scouring vs. time) since direct coupling with the hydrodynamic solver is not possible?
Kaushik15 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2024, 05:47
Default
  #2
Member
 
Alexander Hanke
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Trondheim
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 3
harenaobsidet is on a distinguished road
Hi Kaushik,
The sediment time is decoupled from the hydrodynamic time as the sediment time scale is usually a lot larger than the hydrodynamic time scale and running the sediment algorithms would slow down the simulation significantly.
You can force both cycles to run at the same time if you want by using S 42 1 and S 44 1.
However, we usually don't print out results every step so as long as a sediment calculation is performed in between each print out it should not change anything.
And for a scour vs time graph you can use ParaView to create a graph from the output files.
__________________
Alexander Hanke
Team REEF3D
www.reef3d.com
harenaobsidet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2024, 06:23
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Kaushik Majumdar
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Kharagpur, India
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 2
Kaushik15 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the answer.

However, the morphological solver time step with respect to the hydrodynamic solver is actually affecting the amount of scouring that is occuring. Is that supposed to happen? Also, I thought scouring could be directly plotted from the SedimentMax.dat output file?

Is there any other less computationally expensive way to get a proper scouring vs. time plot?
Kaushik15 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2024, 09:45
Default
  #4
Member
 
Alexander Hanke
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Trondheim
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 3
harenaobsidet is on a distinguished road
The time step ratio should not influence the results, but I don't know if the dynamic behaviour is identical which different ratios. You could take a look into: Ahmad N. (2018) High-Resolution CFD Modelling of Scour in the Marine Environment, Doctoral Theses at NTNU Trondheim.

Yes, for a S or S/D over time plot SedimentMax is enough. The print-out there is also related to the sediment time step.

If you need higher temporal resolution, there is no way to avoid reducing the sediment time step.
__________________
Alexander Hanke
Team REEF3D
www.reef3d.com
harenaobsidet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2024, 02:10
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Kaushik Majumdar
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Kharagpur, India
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 2
Kaushik15 is on a distinguished road
Thank you for answering.
Kaushik15 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
monopile, sediment transport


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
courant number increases to rather large values 6863523 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 22 July 5, 2023 23:48
LES, Courant Number, Crash, Sudden Alhasan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 November 22, 2019 02:05
Inconsistencies in reading .dat file during run time in new injection model Scram_1 OpenFOAM 0 March 23, 2018 22:29
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 June 10, 2013 09:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:50.