CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > REEF3D

active wave absorption-wave is not correct

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 4, 2024, 08:06
Default active wave absorption-wave is not correct
  #1
New Member
 
maple
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
mapleleaf is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone
I want to use AWA method to research wave-induced scour,it will reduce the longth of normal NWT.
But when i simulate cnoidal wave,i find the trough is not correct. So i want to ask if there are some additional parameters to be set or there are some mistakes in my contral. I hopo you give me some suggestions.
I have attach my control,ctrl files,simulation result. The version which i use is REEF3D-23.11 and DIVEMesh-23.11.
control file
C 11 6
C 12 3
C 13 3
C 14 7
C 15 21
C 16 3
B 1 0.02
B 10 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.02 0.0 0.8
M 20 2
M 10 24

ctrl file
B 10 1
B 50 0.0001
B 90 1
B 92 6
B 91 0.1 8.8
B 98 4
B 99 3

D 10 4
D 20 2
D 30 1

F 30 3
F 40 3
F 42 0.8
F 60 0.40

I 12 1

N 40 3
N 41 60.0
N 47 0.20

M 10 24

W 22 -9.81

P 10 1
P 30 0.1
P 52 0.01
P 53 1
P 55 1.00
P 50 0.2 0.01
P 51 0.2 0.01

P 50 0.7 0.01
P 51 0.7 0.01

P 50 1.2 0.01
P 51 1.2 0.01

P 50 1.7 0.01
P 51 1.7 0.01

P 50 2.2 0.01
P 51 2.2 0.01

P 50 2.7 0.01
P 51 2.7 0.01

P 50 3.2 0.01
P 51 3.2 0.01

P 50 3.7 0.01
P 51 3.7 0.01

P 50 4.2 0.01
P 51 4.2 0.01

P 61 0.7 0.01 0.01
P 61 1.2 0.01 0.01
P 61 1.7 0.01 0.01
P 61 2.2 0.01 0.01
P 61 2.7 0.01 0.01
P 61 3.2 0.01 0.01
P 61 3.7 0.01 0.01
Attached Images
File Type: png height guage_P5.png (25.3 KB, 13 views)

Last edited by mapleleaf; June 4, 2024 at 10:03.
mapleleaf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2024, 11:31
Default
  #2
Member
 
Felix S.
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Germany, Braunschweig
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 6
Felix_Sp is on a distinguished road
Hey,

AWA might not always be the best option for wave absorption. The velocity profile of your Cnodial wave is inherently different from shallow water wave theory You might try B99 4 or 5, yet I think for accurate wave absorption most of the time the relaxation zones work best.

So I would suggest you try B 98 4 + B 99 2 together with a relaxation zone of 8.8 m? (B 96 0.0 8.8). You might find sufficient accuracy for shorter relaxation zones, but I guess that is sth. you have to test for yourself.

Maybe somebody else has a better solution.

Kind regards
Felix
Felix_Sp is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2024, 16:08
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Hans Bihs
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 396
Rep Power: 18
valgrinda is on a distinguished road
AWA works actually quite fine for these types of conditions (long waves in not too deep water). We have done this successfully many times (see Nadeem's paper: https://www.reef3d.com/wp-content/up...de_by_side.pdf)

I would choose another wave theory though, just go with B 92 8 (in case these are the correct conditions for cnoidal waves).
__________________
Hans Bihs
Team REEF3D
www.reef3d.com
valgrinda is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[waves2Foam] Waves2Foam Related Topics ngj OpenFOAM Community Contributions 660 August 20, 2018 12:39
Pressure wave reflection at wall boundaries gotang CFX 3 July 18, 2018 19:52
CFD in Naval Hydrodynamics, Off-Shore and Wave Modelling with OpenFOAM hjasak OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 2 February 13, 2017 04:59
IHFOAM - Wave generation with moving boundaries Phicau OpenFOAM Verification & Validation 0 May 18, 2015 04:53
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:19.