CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > REEF3D

Sediment transport problem due to current

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 17, 2022, 04:50
Default Sediment transport problem due to current
  #1
Member
 
Ajay Jatoliya
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 4
ajayjatoliya is on a distinguished road
Hello REEF 3D team,
I am trying to simulate the problem scour due to current, which is done in the paper "Three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling of scour
around a single pile due to the combined action of the waves and current using
Level-Set method". In that paper, the modeled time is 72000 sec. i also provide the same, but in my simulations, the scour depth (15.3 mm) is achieved too early. i am providing sediment = 0.30 m . in the sediment log file, the bedmin = 0.05 after a certain time. Does it mean my scour is (0.30-0.05 = 25)? if it is true, then I am getting scour depth too early.
Please look into this matter and suggest where I have to change the control and ctrl files.
I attached my sediment log file screenshot, last two columns in the screenshot are bedmin and bedmax. Please have a look on that
Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot (52).jpg (101.9 KB, 51 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt ctrl (16).txt (458 Bytes, 20 views)
File Type: txt control (12).txt (130 Bytes, 9 views)
ajayjatoliya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2022, 02:39
Default
  #2
Member
 
Ajay Jatoliya
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 4
ajayjatoliya is on a distinguished road
Sir please you once look into the matter
ajayjatoliya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2023, 09:16
Default
  #3
Member
 
Ajay Jatoliya
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 4
ajayjatoliya is on a distinguished road
Hello REEF 3D Teams

I attached the ctrl and control file in which I am trying to solve scour around a pier, but the shape is not forming below the pier as Well the whole bed is deforming also, and the flow surface is not correct. Sir, if possible, could you please look into this once?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot (56).jpg (33.8 KB, 65 views)
File Type: png Screenshot (55).png (135.3 KB, 53 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt control (15).txt (131 Bytes, 18 views)
File Type: txt ctrl (22).txt (441 Bytes, 21 views)
ajayjatoliya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2023, 07:58
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Ronja
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 7
Ronja is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I get a bit confused now which case corresponding to the paper you mentioned you are trying to model. I cannot find that your simulation setup matches with one of the steady current cases.


However, my suggestions:
- be aware of your water depth: F 60 0.2 (initial still water depth) and S 57 0.12 (initial sediment bed) result in a water depth of only 0.08 m. Take care of your discharge/flow velocities also.
- extend your domain
- use a relaxation zone in the beginning (S 73)
- try T 10 2
- Bedload Formula: Engelund&Fredsře
- be aware of the critical shields value

- restrict the max sediment time step when you are using it adaptable, e.g. S 13 0.1
- try a longer time before the sediment algorithm starts (S 43)-> check your flow state before the sediment agorithm starts
- be aware of decoupled hydrodynamic timestep and morphodynamic timestep (see S 14). Use S 19 for the the stopping criterion of the sediment simuation time


Hope that helps.
__________________
Ronja
Team REEF3D
www.reef3d.com
Ronja is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2023, 08:51
Default
  #5
Member
 
Ajay Jatoliya
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 4
ajayjatoliya is on a distinguished road
Hii Ronja, thanks for the reply

(https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1438924 ) In this paper, I am trying to replicate the problem(2.2.1.1 (Baykal et al. (2015))). I am keeping the parameter the same as in the paper.

Also, I am facing a problem with the inflow boundary. Here the turbulence is more, which I want to reduce.

In this paper, they use the k-omega SST turbulence model, that's why I used T 10 22


Thanks
ajayjatoliya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2023, 15:04
Default
  #6
Member
 
Ajay Jatoliya
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 4
ajayjatoliya is on a distinguished road
I am also unable to understand how to implement S 73. Could you once please explain what does all the parameter stands for in S 73?
ajayjatoliya is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current density visualisation (PEM fuel cell add-on module) pchoopanya FLUENT 10 August 21, 2023 15:33
Source Term due to evaporation in energy transport equation styleworker OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 September 7, 2022 04:09
GenerateVolumeMesh Error - Surface Wrapper Self Interacting (?) AndreP STAR-CCM+ 10 August 2, 2018 08:48
problem in sediment scour modeling!!! hamidciv FLOW-3D 2 November 2, 2017 05:07
Free Surface Flow with Sediment Transport M. Riffai CFX 3 September 5, 2013 10:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:47.