CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Mesh Generation & Pre-Processing Software > Pointwise & Gridgen

Non-orthogonality and FLUENT

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 8, 2021, 12:52
Arrow Non-orthogonality and FLUENT
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 7
EleGiova is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am creating a 3D hybrid mesh of a Propeller with Pointwise (18.4 R3) and then I will use Ansys FLUENT (20 R1) as solver.
I am having problems with non-orthogonality, in particular with the communication between the 2 software.

In my mesh I currently have a maximum non-orthogonality of 63 (since in Pointwise the scale is 0-100), but when I import the grid in FLUENT and perform a mesh check quality I have a minimum non-ortho of 0.04, which isn't acceptable.

What is the maximum value of non-orthogonality in PW which corresponds to 0,15 in FLUENT (=minimum acceptable value in FLUENT)?

Thank you,
E.G
EleGiova is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2021, 13:28
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Pay D.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 166
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 15
pdp.aero is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by EleGiova View Post
Hello,

I am creating a 3D hybrid mesh of a Propeller with Pointwise (18.4 R3) and then I will use Ansys FLUENT (20 R1) as solver.
I am having problems with non-orthogonality, in particular with the communication between the 2 software.

In my mesh I currently have a maximum non-orthogonality of 63 (since in Pointwise the scale is 0-100), but when I import the grid in FLUENT and perform a mesh check quality I have a minimum non-ortho of 0.04, which isn't acceptable.

What is the maximum value of non-orthogonality in PW which corresponds to 0,15 in FLUENT (=minimum acceptable value in FLUENT)?

Thank you,
E.G
I dunno the answer but I were you I would create a a very simple two mesh for which I know the non-orthogonality value in PW and then import the mesh in FL and see the corresponding value there.
pdp.aero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2021, 11:24
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 7
EleGiova is on a distinguished road
Yes I have already done that.
I have discovered that the value for skewness is the same for both Pointwise and Ansys Fluent, so it has to be less than 0.8 etc.
While the value for orthogonality that we have in Pointwise is the same we have on OpenFOAM, so it has to be less than 65.
I have imported a cube with a perfect cartesian mesh and its orthogonal quality in Pointwise was 0, so I suppose the lower the better.
For my mesh I was able to have orthogonality lower than 50 in Pointwise, but Fluent didn't like it anyway, so at this point I don't know what is the real link.

This was my "research", end of the story: I changed the mesh generator.
EleGiova is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2021, 13:56
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Pay D.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 166
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 15
pdp.aero is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by EleGiova View Post
Yes I have already done that.
I have discovered that the value for skewness is the same for both Pointwise and Ansys Fluent, so it has to be less than 0.8 etc.
While the value for orthogonality that we have in Pointwise is the same we have on OpenFOAM, so it has to be less than 65.
I have imported a cube with a perfect cartesian mesh and its orthogonal quality in Pointwise was 0, so I suppose the lower the better.
For my mesh I was able to have orthogonality lower than 50 in Pointwise, but Fluent didn't like it anyway, so at this point I don't know what is the real link.

This was my "research", end of the story: I changed the mesh generator.
I have no idea what is your case, how you have generated the mesh, what kinda mesh you generated and what is your physics but I am sure if you contact their customer services and explain your problem with the mesh when you import it in FL, they would sincerely help you. Good luck!
pdp.aero is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison of fluent and CFX for turbomachinery Far CFX 52 December 26, 2014 19:11
[ICEM] Improving mesh orthogonality in ICEM or Fluent Harshal ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 December 2, 2013 10:04
Orthogonality of cell check nkjsimulating ANSA 6 November 26, 2013 11:31
[ANSYS Meshing] Fluent quality criteria in AM and Gambit Far ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 March 24, 2012 04:35
CFX or Fluent for Turbo machinery ? Far FLUENT 3 May 27, 2011 04:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:53.