|
[Sponsors] |
April 2, 2014, 09:09 |
initialize problem
|
#1 |
New Member
Fabrizio
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12 |
hello all,
i have a problem in initialization of a block. I can not understand why pointwise builds some pyramids on the external side of the surfaces. I attach a picture. thanks |
|
April 2, 2014, 09:35 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Chris Sideroff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, ON, CAN
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 22 |
Can you give us a little more information. Is it unstructured, structured or hybrid (prism+unstructured)? Did you examine the mesh in Pointwise? Is it OK there?
|
|
April 2, 2014, 09:49 |
initialize problem
|
#3 |
New Member
Fabrizio
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12 |
the external surfaces of the cylinder are structured domains, the base circular area of the cylinder is an unstructured domain; the block is unstructured.
I built an other cylinder in the same way and i have not this issue. I attach some pictures for a better explanation. In the first picture you can see how i built the block, in the second one it is possible to observe the "external" pyramids on the surface. thanks |
|
April 2, 2014, 10:03 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Chris Sideroff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, ON, CAN
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 22 |
Quote:
That should fix it. I see you're using OpenFOAM so I'll offer another tip. If you haven't already, I highly recommend using renumberMesh, e.g.: Code:
renumberMesh -overwrite |
||
April 2, 2014, 11:19 |
perfect
|
#5 |
New Member
Fabrizio
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12 |
thank you very much, you resolved me a very annoying problem.
Can you help me to obtain the block extruding the base circular area? if i try to use as path one of the connector on lateral surface I can not match the other circular base, so the real stl. thanks |
|
April 2, 2014, 16:39 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Chris Sideroff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, ON, CAN
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 22 |
Quote:
If this doesn't work, I would suggest making a structured mesh on the circular ends of the pipe, then along with the domains on the side of the pipe assemble a structured block. |
||
April 2, 2014, 17:49 |
Extrusion
|
#7 |
New Member
Fabrizio
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12 |
Yes, It is correct! I have already though to extrude the base using the "axys curve" as path, but i do not know how to draw it, is there a strategy?
I does not build a structured block because the other one downside contains a valve, so i have to make it unstructured and I do not want a strength change of shape of cells at the interface between the 2 blocks. Sorry for my poor English and thank you very much. Last edited by kasto89; April 3, 2014 at 10:08. |
|
April 3, 2014, 17:17 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
Chris Sideroff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, ON, CAN
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 22 |
Quote:
If this is not option, you can try to rebuild it in Pointwise. The success of doing so depends on the how the pipe's trajectory changes shape. If does something simple like a circular bend that this shouldn't be hard. If however it's a more general shape it'll be harder. This difficult to explain in words so here it is in pictures (the number refers the image name suffix) 01: my pipe has a straight section, followed by a circular bend, followed by another straight section. 02: create a straight 2 pt curve across the diameter of the circular cross section 03: split the previous 2 pt curve in the middle 04: create a db point at split location (delete two curves). the point will be at the center of the cross section. 05: repeat 02 thru 04 for each cross section. Mine has 4. 06: draw appropriate curve type between each point. Mine is straight 2 pt curve, circular arc and another 2 pt curve. 07: final trajectory. create a connector(s) on trajectory that canbe used to drive path based extrusion As I mentioned the trick will be knowing the trajectory path. If it's simple things like straight lines or circular bends, it should be no problem. Otherwise you'll have to guess and use a more general curve type (Bezier or Conic). Good luck, Chris |
||
April 3, 2014, 17:18 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Chris Sideroff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, ON, CAN
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 22 |
Last two images.
|
|
April 4, 2014, 05:36 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Fabrizio
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12 |
ok, thank you very much, i have already tried something like that.
now I have an other problem, I cannot initialized an unstructured block, "one or more entities could not be initialize"; ok solved, i had a bad surface |
|
March 27, 2015, 06:40 |
One or more entities could not be initialized
|
#11 |
New Member
Bharatesh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi guys,
even i have similar problem. I'm using Windows platform(32 bit), and the total cells are roughly 2 million, after creating the Block, when tried to 'initialize', the file is processed for some time and i get an error saying "One or more entities could not be initialized", i don't understand which entities could not be initialized!. System info: platform: Windows XP (32bit) RAM: 1GB Can somebody help me please.. |
|
March 29, 2015, 20:02 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
John Chawner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 275
Rep Power: 18 |
When an unstructured volume mesh cannot be initialized it's usually because the mesher cannot recover the surface cells. Therefore, check the quality of all the surface meshes on the block's faces.
Hope this helps.
__________________
John Chawner / jrc@pointwise.com / www.pointwise.com Blog: http://blog.pointwise.com/ on Twitter: @jchawner |
|
March 31, 2015, 01:03 |
How to reduce Skewness in pointwise 17.2
|
#13 | |
New Member
Bharatesh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
I got the issue resolved, however i'm facing new one.. What I did is:- 1. Completed the meshing with 1.44 million cells (approx.), 2. Imported mesh file in .cas format to Ansys Fluent 14 3. Did Mesh Check, appears to be okay, and Orthogonal Quality is 0.12 4. When I try to Run the file in the solver, it says that the Max Skewness is more than 0.98. Since I did not get any warning message while doing mesh check, its now bothering me alot.. 5. How can I reduce the Skewness?? I examined the mesh file in Pointwise, the 'Max. Included Angle' appears to be well below 173. Attaching the 'Centroid Skewness' screenshot. |
||
March 31, 2015, 10:01 |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
John Chawner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 275
Rep Power: 18 |
It seems that your best approach would be to determine which of Pointwise's skewness metrics best matches what Fluent calls "Max Skewness" and look at it in the Examine command and use the Extrema function to zoom in to it's maximum value. See what's going on there and take appropriate action.
__________________
John Chawner / jrc@pointwise.com / www.pointwise.com Blog: http://blog.pointwise.com/ on Twitter: @jchawner |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with interFoam; Wave/wiggle alpha1 behavior | JonW | OpenFOAM | 10 | February 4, 2023 08:27 |
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem | JFDC | FLUENT | 1 | July 11, 2011 06:59 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 07:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 20:13 |
Is this problem well posed? | Thomas P. Abraham | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 8, 1999 15:52 |