|
[Sponsors] |
Re: supersonic free jet nonphysical solution?? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 23, 2008, 22:12 |
Re: supersonic free jet nonphysical solution??
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I had a problem with the underexpanded free jet in the Case Library - I believe it's case 911. This gives the correct shock structure in 2-dimensions. When I change this into a three dimensional case (by adding circumferential grid points), and change all the objects (inlets, outlets, inits) to 3-D, it begins to experience very strong inflows at points next to the axis at the outlet. I tried: - dramatically increasing relaxations - decreasing the "snap" distance setting on the grid (maybe some of the points were degenerate?) - increasing the "coefficient" setting of the inlet
I don't know what else to try. I have occasionally experienced nonphysical behavior in cylindrical coordinates before and wonder if that's a hazard from the convergence of circumferential points near the axis, or if it's a problem with the solver? Thank You!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nonphysical volume fractions at multiphase inlet | sylvester | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | July 1, 2009 11:52 |
Nonphysical flow field while using coodles solver | ankgupta8um | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | January 26, 2008 17:54 |
how to make solution converge in supersonic flows | xiaofish | FLUENT | 2 | November 27, 2007 16:41 |
Mixed supersonic-subsonic inlet solution? | Mohammad Kermani | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 14, 2000 18:56 |
Turbulent model of supersonic free jet | GAZZAH Mohamed Hichem | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 18, 2000 16:43 |