|
[Sponsors] |
August 27, 2008, 11:10 |
the order of GROUND calling
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all,
Suppose I have the following setting in Q1 Group-13 : PATCH(ABC,PHASEM,1,NX,1,NY,1,1,1,1) COVAL(ABC,U2,GRND,0) COVAL(ABC,U1,GRND,0) Which one will the EARTH call first via GROUND ? Is it the CO of U2 ? Does the order of setting (for the same group and section) in Q1 matter in GROUND ? Thank's, Noel |
|
August 29, 2008, 10:13 |
Re: the order of GROUND calling
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The solution order is U1 and then U2, and so I believe that the CO of U1 will be processed first by the PHOENICS CFD solution algorithm.
|
|
August 30, 2008, 12:26 |
Re: the order of GROUND calling
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank's a lot, Mike.
If I set the COVAL of many main conserved variables (P1,U1,U2,V1,V2,R1,R2,H1,H2,C1,C2,...), how is the order of GROUND ? Sometimes I need to update the value of an array to be used by the COVAL of all those variables. What I have in mind is, updating the array in the COVAl of the first variable accessed by the Group 13 of GROUND. |
|
September 1, 2008, 11:31 |
Re: the order of GROUND calling
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can find out the order also by putting a write statement in ground.for (in group 13 , CO (GRND)) and using the variable Indvar (You can do this only for one sweep) open(Unit=500, status='unknown',file='order.txt') IF(INDVAR.EQ.U1)Then write(500,*)'U1' ENDIF IF(INDVAR.EQ.U2)then write(500,*)'U2' ENDIF IF(INDVAR.EQ.ITEM1)then write(500,*)'ITEM1' ENDIF
etc... then you inspect the file created order.txt and see in which order each variable is appearing |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calling DLL | BS | FLUENT | 2 | February 26, 2008 18:21 |
Calling all Refrigeration Engineers! | John | FLUENT | 0 | December 14, 2004 23:34 |
calling the iteration value | D Harvey | FLUENT | 0 | July 12, 2004 01:08 |
Calling matlab program | Pr | Main CFD Forum | 4 | April 8, 2004 06:39 |
calling matlab from fortran | prasat | Main CFD Forum | 5 | February 4, 2003 17:04 |