|
[Sponsors] |
August 24, 2007, 08:22 |
Dear Mike, ...
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Mike, i have a question regarding the implementation of the laminar transport coefficient for solving Enhalpy in Phoenics.
Setting 1: Q1: PRNDTL(H1)=GRND GRND: VAL=DMU/(k/cp), where DMU=dynamic molecular viscosity, and ENUL=DMU/RHO1, in effect to achieve k/cp. Setting 2: Q1: PRNDTL(H1)=-GRND GRND: VAL=k/cp I have tried both implementations with different results but couldn't explain the differences. Please advice. |
|
August 30, 2007, 06:59 |
Re: Dear Mike, ...
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If PRNDTL(H1)=GRND, then the laminar Prandtl number should be set directly in GROUND, ie RHO1*CP*ENUL/K.
If PRNDTL(H1)= - GRND, then my undestanding is that the laminar diffusivity should be set in GROUND, ie K/(RHO1*CP). If these two methods don't produce identical results for the same case, let me know and I will investigate in more detail. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dear Dr. Mike | Baheri | Phoenics | 0 | September 24, 2007 08:03 |
Dear Members | Dr.K.Thiruvenkatasamy | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 23, 2007 13:52 |
Dear Dr Mike | Mehdi BEN HAJ | Phoenics | 2 | February 7, 2007 04:18 |
Dear Dr. Mike....(GCV method) | Sima Baheri | Phoenics | 1 | January 3, 2007 08:30 |
Conversion of a mike file | MER | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 28, 2004 12:34 |