|
[Sponsors] |
February 4, 2006, 11:36 |
Free slip and no slip.
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How rough ness can be found out?what is the formula?Second thing I have not understood about free slip and no slip ? I want to know that when free slip and no slip should be provided?
|
|
February 10, 2006, 14:32 |
Re: Free slip and no slip.
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Look in POLis under things like Roughness, Wall etc The formula is in POLIS somewhere.
I think people tend to use the language Slip and no slip when they are talking about two-phase flows. For example in two phase the second phase may be a solid and this may be completely convected by the carrier fluid (no slip), or it may be pushed along at a different speed to the carrier fluid (slip). |
|
March 2, 2006, 10:56 |
Re: Free slip and no slip.
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah maybe, but more likely he is interested in rarefication/ganulation, where the non-slip boundary condition becomes invalid, and wall slip must be allowed. This occurs when the Knudson number is very high (Kn > 0.01). Free slip is essentially the same as a symmetry in that there is no stress at the wall.
With regards to wall roughness, you generally use an equivilant sand roughness scale. The best reference I can think of is Frank White's Viscous Flow, but google is your friend. Try searching for Moody diagram as a nice academic starting point. |
|
March 2, 2006, 12:04 |
Re: Free slip and no slip.
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
PHOENICS is equipped with roughness wall functions that employ the sand-grain roughness formulae of Jayatilleke. These formulae fit the data of Moody, Nikaradse, etc very well. In these wall functions, the roughness parameter and sub-layer resistance function, that appear respectively in the log laws for momentum and energy, are made a function of the roughness Reynolds number. The formulae are given here:
http://www.cham.co.uk/phoenics/d_pol...d/enc_tu84.htm There is also an option in PHOENICS to use the fully-rough log law of the wall, which is often used to describe wind profiles in external aerodynamic problems. This law employs a user-specified effective roughness length. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boundary details, free slip or no slip? | Tiago | CFX | 5 | August 20, 2013 23:54 |
Free slip and no slip. | Yung | CFX | 2 | February 6, 2006 23:26 |
Free slip and no slip. | Yung | Siemens | 0 | February 4, 2006 11:37 |
Free slip and no slip. | yung | FLUENT | 0 | February 4, 2006 11:26 |
free slip and no slip | sreenivas | CFX | 3 | November 13, 2003 08:17 |