|
[Sponsors] |
September 17, 2003, 17:08 |
Non-Newtonian power law fluids
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am working with non-Newtonian power law fluids in PHOENICS and have come across a couple of uncertainties and I am simply going to throw these out and if anyone can help clarify them it would be greatly appreciated. I am trying to simulate simple pseadoplastic and dilitant fluids, which are given by the standard shear stress-shear rate equation of:
Tao = mu*(du/dy)^n In polis, the calculation of the viscosity (kinematic) is given by ENUL = ENULA*(LGEN1)^((ENULB-1)/2)/RAO and states that for ENULB = 1 the fluid is Newtonian (a value of n = 1 in the above equation). The whole part of using (ENULB-1)/2 is somewhat confusing, as it is not clearly stated why it is in this form. If, for example, I use B = 0.5, is this the same as n = 0.5? I believe it is, but I would like some confirmation on this. Polis states that LGEN1 is the strain rate squared. Why is this squared? Is it so that in the calculation of the viscosity it forces the viscosity to be positive? I assume that the following is the case: shear stress = viscosity*strain rate tao = {ENULA*((LGEN1)^2)^((ENULB-1)/2)}*(LGEN1) where the ^2 is there to make sure that the viscosity stays positive (but the second du/dy is the *real* strain rate that allows for the correct sign for the shear stress) this equaiton collapses to: tao = ENULA*LGEN1^(2*(ENULB-1)/2)*LGEN1 and then to tao = ENULA*LGEN^ENULB and therefore ENULA = mu and ENULB = n Is this correct? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Non-Newtonian fluids | Nikolaos | FLOW-3D | 10 | May 23, 2011 07:21 |
non newtonian power law | dana mahfouz | FLUENT | 0 | October 4, 2005 10:21 |
non-newtonian fluids | mateus | FLUENT | 6 | February 28, 2004 07:37 |
non-Newtonian fluids | solomon | Main CFD Forum | 9 | January 16, 2002 06:14 |
CFD of Non-Newtonian fluids | S.Sri Govind | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 18, 1999 03:24 |