|
[Sponsors] |
May 19, 2003, 04:33 |
thermal conductivity
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
During the simulation of heat transfer during laser-solid interactions I came to the result that for a given value of the thermal conductivity ( set by PRNDTL(TEM1)=-5.0 in Q1) the calculated temperature distribution did not correspond to this value but to a thermal conductivity which is orders of magnitude higher. I have checked that against results obtained with an other FE-package and also against experimental results. Are there any factors that I have missed?
|
|
May 19, 2003, 06:17 |
Re: thermal conductivity
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Please contact CHAM User Support at support@cham.co.uk, giving details of the PHOENICS version and attaching the Q1 and any geometry or ground files needed.
|
|
May 22, 2003, 08:36 |
Re: thermal conductivity
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Your analysis is correct. The problem is that V3.4 erroneously uses (density*thermal conductivity) for the thermal conductivity in the TEM1 equation, if storage is NOT provided for the property material index, i.e. the PHOENICS whole-field variable PRPS has not been STOREd. This problem is not present in the later release, i.e. PHOENICS V3.5. The problem can be cured by activating storage of PRPS from the VR Environment under:
'Menu'>'Models'>'Solution control/Extra Variables'. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
thermal conductivity | Cirilo | Siemens | 3 | April 23, 2012 13:08 |
UDF for effective thermal conductivity | Rashmi | FLUENT | 1 | November 6, 2007 21:08 |
Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity | Saturn | CFX | 4 | January 30, 2007 13:34 |
anisotropic thermal conductivity | Lugdi | Siemens | 0 | January 15, 2007 09:03 |
Anisotropic thermal conductivity | Helger Dooley | CFX | 2 | September 1, 2005 09:52 |