CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

K-Omega Model

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 21, 2012, 15:46
Default K-Omega Model
  #1
Member
 
pooyan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 15
sam1364 is on a distinguished road
Hi All,

I am simulating incompressible turbulent flow over a flat plate using OpenFoam. I am doing RANS simulation and I have selected k-omega turbulence model. I want to get the profile of U+ vs. y+ and validate it with theory. For my simulation, I do not want to use any wall function and I am using pisoFoam transiet solver available in OpenFoam. my problem is that the convergence when not using wall function is so slow and I should use a very small time step for stable solution. has anyone else faced this convergence issue before?!
Besides, I have some problems with steasy solver " simpleFoam ". I use the same fvSchemes and fvSolution as one exists in tutorial for k-omega sst model, but the solution will be wrong this way. Do you have any idea how I can find the right schemes for k-omega model for steady state simulation?!

I have attached the B.C for my problem.

Thanks,
Attached Files
File Type: pdf BC.pdf (19.3 KB, 121 views)
sam1364 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2012, 03:59
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
romant's Avatar
 
Roman Thiele
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eindhoven, NL
Posts: 374
Rep Power: 21
romant is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sam1364 View Post
Hi All,

I am simulating incompressible turbulent flow over a flat plate using OpenFoam. I am doing RANS simulation and I have selected k-omega turbulence model. I want to get the profile of U+ vs. y+ and validate it with theory. For my simulation, I do not want to use any wall function and I am using pisoFoam transiet solver available in OpenFoam. my problem is that the convergence when not using wall function is so slow and I should use a very small time step for stable solution. has anyone else faced this convergence issue before?!
Besides, I have some problems with steasy solver " simpleFoam ". I use the same fvSchemes and fvSolution as one exists in tutorial for k-omega sst model, but the solution will be wrong this way. Do you have any idea how I can find the right schemes for k-omega model for steady state simulation?!

I have attached the B.C for my problem.

Thanks,
Why do you use an outlet at the top boundary. I think I would use something similar to a symmetry plane at this one as well. or if you use an outlet there I would use a pressure condition that is similar to total pressure, like an atmosphere.

The solution should be steady after a while, therefore a steady solver like simpleFoam should be sufficient, except you want to simulate developing flow.

The omega wall function is not a real wall function, it is a continuous wall function. You should probably use it for omega at the wall. Did you make sure your y+<1, since you are not using any wall functions? Additionally, if you use a cell gradient towards the wall, make sure that it is very smooth, such as an expansion/growth factor of 1.1 or 1.2. k-omega-SST in OF seems to be sensitive to this.
__________________
~roman
romant is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help for different between les model (subgrid-scale model) liuyuxuan FLUENT 1 October 2, 2009 16:25
Grid resolution for full-scale and down scaled model gravis Main CFD Forum 0 October 2, 2009 11:27
Use of k omega turbulence model john_w OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 September 22, 2009 06:15
2 stage axial turbine model convergence issues sherifkadry CFX 2 September 7, 2009 21:51
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model Jonas Larsson FLUENT 5 March 13, 2000 04:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:08.