|
[Sponsors] |
February 14, 2012, 06:29 |
Mesh quality improvement
|
#1 |
Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello Foamers
I have a simple mesh generated by blockMesh, which however contains some "bad" cells. I generate sets for these cells with "checkMesh -allTopology -allGeometry" and can visualize them in paraView after isolating them with "setSet -batch makeCellSets.setSet" and "subsetMesh badCells". However, I have not been able to fix them. Is there a non-manual (scriptable) way of using the foam mesh manipulation utilities in which I could fix the "bad" cells? I am looking for a combination of the mesh manipulation tools that can improve the quality of my mesh, mostly in terms of simulation stability. Sorry if the question is rather vague or this information has been posted elsewhere but I have not been able to find it. |
|
February 20, 2012, 09:19 |
|
#2 |
Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
Bump. I would appreciate an answer, even if it's negative.
I wonder what I am doing so wrong and no one answers my posts |
|
February 20, 2012, 10:04 |
|
#3 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings anon_a,
AFAIK, no, there is no utility in OpenFOAM that fixes bad cells. The standard is to do things right the first time around. Nonetheless, there are a few things that might come in handy in some situations:
Code:
paraFoam -block Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
February 20, 2012, 11:47 |
|
#4 |
Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
Ok, I was sure I was the one doing it wrong :-D
My geometry is slightly more complicated than I can handle with blockMesh anymore, so I guess I will try something else. I was asking because I would prefer to adapt the mesh to the changes in the flow along with time. For example, create the blockMesh in the beginning, run the simulation for 1ms, refine/remove cells, correct the "bad" cells, resume the simulation for 1 ms and so on. I am sure someone must have done something similar, right? Thanks a lot for the answer Bruno! |
|
February 20, 2012, 12:59 |
|
#5 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Ah, then that's a whole other ball game...
See the tutorials that use dynamic meshes, because there are several that use point displacement. But I've yet to understand how they work
__________________
|
|
February 20, 2012, 13:08 |
|
#6 |
Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 |
I was afraid you were going to say that...
So the keyword here is point displacement, I will look for that. Thanks :-) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors | DarrenC | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 11 | August 5, 2013 07:42 |
[ICEM] Tetra mesh quality before and after prism layer | Chander | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | December 25, 2011 23:04 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |