CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

simple question about boundaryT

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 27, 2011, 19:25
Default simple question about boundaryT
  #1
spk
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17
spk is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,

I run a 2D orifice geometry using dsmcFoam!
The temperature inside the orifice geometry is 293 K and remains constant.
The types of the boundary conditions are: wedge,
wall, total pressure, pressureInletVelocity and "empty" for
frontAndBackPlanes.

In the "0" folder there is a boundaryT file, as i can see in the
dsmc tutorials.
I have to define the temperature for all the types of boundary conditions?
And for the value, i will define uniform and 293 K?

Thanks!!!
spk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2011, 04:14
Default
  #2
Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15
anon_a is on a distinguished road
The temperature is needed for boundaries where particles are being injected with a Maxwellian distribution. Therefore, you would not need this for empty, symmetryPlane and wedge boundaries (note that wedge does not work with dsmcFoam).

The temperature value depends on the definition of your problem. I assume that the temperature of the gas in the containers upstream and downstream is 293K and therefore yes, you need to use "uniform 293".
anon_a is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2011, 05:00
Default
  #3
spk
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17
spk is on a distinguished road
Thanks a lot anon_a!
I'll use symmetryPlane instead of wedge!
Yes the temperature of the gas in the containers upstream and downstream is 293K, ok i'll use uniform 293!
spk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2011, 05:09
Default
  #4
spk
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17
spk is on a distinguished road
For the wall of the orifice, i'll define uniform 293?
The only thing i know is that the temperature of the gas in the containers upstream and downstream is 293K.
spk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2011, 08:09
Default
  #5
Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15
anon_a is on a distinguished road
Again, it depends on the definition of your problem.
There is no readily available boundary condition for adiabatic walls in dsmcFoam and you don't specify another temperature for the walls so I guess I would use isothermal walls at 293K. That is the usual case.
anon_a is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2011, 18:56
Default
  #6
spk
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17
spk is on a distinguished road
Thanks anon_a!!!
spk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple Outlet Question m.nichols19 OpenFOAM 3 June 25, 2010 02:44
Simple Question Regarding Symmetry Planes Atella CFX 3 April 11, 2010 07:44
Simple Question Regarding Symmetry Planes Atella Main CFD Forum 0 April 9, 2010 11:58
Question of Anil Date's SIMPLE method universez Main CFD Forum 0 November 18, 2009 21:12
Simple Question Regarding Continuity Closure RC FLUENT 2 March 25, 2004 06:30


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25.