|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
Greeting Foam Users,
I'm working on parallelization some of our cases and solvers and was looking to ask questions about distributing data over several disks. I have two multi-core machines I have made into "cluster" and am testing decomposed cases. Just using the built in network cards to communicate (these are Dell Precision T5500 with Broadcom BCM5761 and an ethernet crossover cable). what are some tips to reduce the overhead so that communication quick, or some inexpensive modifications that I could make to improve performance. I was also curious about different methods for domain decomposition. Specifically, how the manual option works (with examples if possible), and if the simple/hierarchical methods can be controlled by subdomain (ie, after the first division of a domain in two equal parts, can I further subdivide one of the sub-domains)? Thanks! Last edited by mturcios777; October 17, 2011 at 20:03. Reason: Added question about manual method and sub-domain control |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,978
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Marco,
I'm going to have to be quick... so here goes... The documented version of said dictionary can be found this way: Code:
find $WM_PROJECT_DIR/applications -name decomposeParDict ![]() All other examples can be found this way: Code:
find $WM_PROJECT_DIR/tutorials -name decomposeParDict As for a whole lot of other notes about OpenFOAM+parallel: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/blo...-parallel.html Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
Many thanks!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
There was a message here about ParaView having a "decomposed case" option, but that has since been deleted. I looked at my current version of ParaView (3.10.1) and was not able to finde the decomposed case option. Does anyone else know about this?
With the paraFoam -touch option, I am able to load all the processors into one instance of ParaView and do post-processing on the entire domain. The only problem is that application of filters has to be done on each processor in turn. Fine for domains of 5 processors or less, but this could get unwieldy (at least the way I'm doing it). We can apply multiple filters to single sources, can we apply a single filter and take as input multiple sources? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,978
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Marco,
Quote:
But if you are using OpenFOAM 2.0, run paraFoam like this: Code:
paraFoam -builtin Quote:
Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 28 ![]() |
Beautiful. I need to play with that feature a bit more, as it seems to have some trouble synchronizing the time directories (it only gives me 0, 0.1111... and 1). The group datasets feature does what I need, albeit with a little bit more work; I'll use it until I can get the built-in reader to work properly.
Much thanks! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
decomposePar gives errors | of_user_ | OpenFOAM | 1 | July 4, 2011 05:27 |
decomposePar: can use this decomposition method only for the whole mesh | aloeven | OpenFOAM Bugs | 0 | March 16, 2011 10:15 |
Strange behaviour 1.6 decomposePar vs 1.7 decomposePar | BlueyTheDog | OpenFOAM | 7 | January 16, 2011 18:12 |
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI | jens_klostermann | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | June 28, 2007 17:51 |
axisymmetric model of two rotating disks cavity | liaolingling | FLUENT | 0 | April 27, 2005 04:24 |