|
[Sponsors] |
October 17, 2011, 01:54 |
openFOAM in fusion plasma
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello,
I am curious about that is it possible to use OpenFOAM in fusion plasma? As fusion plasma has some different properties than cold plasma. It is collisionless and quasineutral. But under certian approximations it can be treated as fluid. So is it possible to develop code in OpenFOAM for simulation of such plasma in toroidal geometry? thank you Regards Last edited by Shoonya; October 17, 2011 at 04:15. |
|
October 17, 2011, 08:19 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Hi Dinesh,
although I have never done anything like that, I would be carefully optimistic about the possibilities of doing something like that. I guess the question is more, how far you are willing to involve yourself into developing the solver/code. I think if you know the basic models for it, it should be possible to write something like that, (ab)using snippets of other solvers... I suggest you try to see if the functions given in the programmers' guide are what you need. For the rest: Good luck! ;-) |
|
October 17, 2011, 11:15 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Earlier I have worked on OF in a convection problem. it seems me that programmer's guide function would support the work, because the required function have been used in liquid metal flows, where MHD equations are solved. After all tokamk plasma also uses modified MHD equations. So my guess OF could be used for the same. I request you please say something more on this. so that I could get better confirmation and start working on it. Your comments are welcome. Thank you thank you Dinesh |
||
October 17, 2011, 11:29 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Hi,
http://web.student.chalmers.se/group...SlidesOFW5.pdf Simulation of magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) flows: electric potential formulation deals with International Thermonuclear Exerimental Reactor |
|
October 17, 2011, 11:33 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
|
Well, unfortunately I can answer only as far as my knowledge goes. As I am far away from doing MHD or Quantum Fluids or things like that, I cannot comment any further...
Good luck anyway! |
|
October 17, 2011, 14:07 |
|
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Thank you to both elvis and Linse , for the quick helpful replies. That link was useful. But sir, it deals with the liquid metals. The MHD theory of liquid metals (used as coolant and flows outside of the tokamak blanket) is different in many respects from the plasma inside the tokamak. Fusion plasmas are high temperature plasmas (~10^8 degree C). Although the MHD equations to be solved for tokamak plasmas are not very different than those are used in MHD of liquid metals. this wiki link Would show the Eqns http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics Since nobody had applied so it in OF for fusion plasma that is why doubt came in my mind. Still I some more information is requested 1) Would the use of OpemFOAM in liquid metals and plasma be similar ? 1) Is it possible to use some inbuilt module or one needs it to develope in OF ? Thank you to both of you Dinesh |
||
October 18, 2011, 09:08 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
|
Dear Dimish,
http://www.extend-project.de/user-gr...ewgroup/groups =>Category:Special Interest Groups Name: MHD flows Description: Developing MHD compressible flow solver... Created: Tuesday, 29 June 2010 Creator:Carlos Xisto Group Forum: MHD flows Group Forum I do not know how active this group is! I am no OF expert, but there are examples of OF with other software http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...1-cantera.html Last edited by elvis; October 18, 2011 at 09:28. |
|
October 18, 2011, 11:48 |
|
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
|
||
October 20, 2011, 10:39 |
|
#9 | |
Senior Member
Mirko Vukovic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 159
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
||
October 20, 2011, 11:27 |
|
#10 | |
Member
Patricio Bohorquez
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jaén, Spain
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 17 |
Have you tried BOUT++?: https://bout2011.llnl.gov/
It shares many points in common with OpenFOAM philosophy and is devoted to tokamak. Quote:
|
||
October 20, 2011, 12:59 |
|
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I thought to request for BOUT++ code to Dr. Dudson and Prof. Xu, but my supervisor suggested me to develop my own code. So, I am trying myself and I do not use BOUT++, however I am aware of this. Do you work in BOUT++? As you are professor and having understanding of fusion plasma, you must be knowing about this question better. Kindly help me in resolving the question that should I try to develop separately the code or use OF for the code development for tokamak plasma. I also wish to know your areas of interests/research in fusion plasma and email address. thank you sir regards Dinesh my email: dinesh2n@gmail.com |
||
October 20, 2011, 13:23 |
|
#12 |
Member
Patricio Bohorquez
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jaén, Spain
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 17 |
I'm sorry but my topic is fluid mechanics, not plasma. So I can just inform you that the code is available at https://github.com/bendudson/BOUT-1.0/wiki and that the programming style seems similar. There is a lot of info to download at the workshop agenda. You can have a look at Bout++ examples and also at OpenFOAM applications to elect or compare both.
|
|
October 20, 2011, 13:33 |
|
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear sir,
Roughly, the Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics equation are in following wiki link : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics In actual case i.e. in Toroidal geometry, the magnetic field has a complicated topology and can not be described by the Cartesian coordinates. Hence the various operators nabla, Laplcian and other discritization have to be done/defined in so called flux coordinates (http://www-fusion.ciemat.es/fusionwi...ux_coordinates). These are different then cylindrical and spherical coordinates and are suitable only for a tokamak plasma. After posting this question I came to realise that if OF only works in Cartesian and the operators/functions are defined in that way then it would not be possible to use OF for tokamak plasma. I might be wrong if you have better idea please suggest. i.e. Question: Can we redefine operator/function of OF for our purpose. If so then why one would do it in OF, shouldn't he do separate coding.? I also want to say that in tokmak blanket case OF works because the liquid metal coolant flows around the tokamak in channel geometry where Cartesian operators/functions work. request for the further comments thank you Dinesh |
|
Tags |
fusion, plasma |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 3 | September 8, 2010 07:25 |
OPENFOAM for Plasma Modelling | masspec | OpenFOAM | 1 | May 22, 2010 08:00 |
Modified OpenFOAM Forum Structure and New Mailing-List | pete | Site News & Announcements | 0 | June 29, 2009 06:56 |
OpenFOAM Debian packaging current status problems and TODOs | oseen | OpenFOAM Installation | 9 | August 26, 2007 14:50 |