CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

openFOAM in fusion plasma

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 17, 2011, 01:54
Default openFOAM in fusion plasma
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17
Shoonya is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I am curious about that is it possible to use OpenFOAM in fusion plasma? As fusion plasma has some different properties than cold plasma. It is collisionless and quasineutral. But under certian approximations it can be treated as fluid. So is it possible to develop code in OpenFOAM for simulation of such plasma in toroidal geometry?

thank you
Regards

Last edited by Shoonya; October 17, 2011 at 04:15.
Shoonya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2011, 08:19
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Bernhard Linseisen
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Heilbronn
Posts: 183
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 16
Linse is on a distinguished road
Hi Dinesh,

although I have never done anything like that, I would be carefully optimistic about the possibilities of doing something like that.
I guess the question is more, how far you are willing to involve yourself into developing the solver/code.
I think if you know the basic models for it, it should be possible to write something like that, (ab)using snippets of other solvers...

I suggest you try to see if the functions given in the programmers' guide are what you need.

For the rest: Good luck! ;-)
Linse is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2011, 11:15
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17
Shoonya is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linse View Post

I guess the question is more, how far you are willing to involve yourself into developing the solver/code.
I suggest you try to see if the functions given in the programmers' guide are what you need.
I am doing PhD in Tokamak fusion plasma. I have seen that OF has been used for plasma Ark and liquid metal flows in tokamak Blankets. Now, if I think to use OF in tokamak plasma, and as you also pointed out the possibility as yes, I wish not to get lost in between.
Earlier I have worked on OF in a convection problem. it seems me that programmer's guide function would support the work, because the required function have been used in liquid metal flows, where MHD equations are solved. After all tokamk plasma also uses modified MHD equations. So my guess OF could be used for the same.
I request you please say something more on this. so that I could get better confirmation and start working on it. Your comments are welcome.

Thank you


thank you
Dinesh
Shoonya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2011, 11:29
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Elvis
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sindelfingen, Germany
Posts: 620
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 24
elvis will become famous soon enough
Hi,

http://web.student.chalmers.se/group...SlidesOFW5.pdf Simulation of magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) flows: electric potential formulation

deals with International Thermonuclear Exerimental Reactor
elvis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2011, 11:33
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Bernhard Linseisen
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Heilbronn
Posts: 183
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 16
Linse is on a distinguished road
Well, unfortunately I can answer only as far as my knowledge goes. As I am far away from doing MHD or Quantum Fluids or things like that, I cannot comment any further...
Good luck anyway!
Linse is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2011, 14:07
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17
Shoonya is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by elvis View Post
Hi,

http://web.student.chalmers.se/group...SlidesOFW5.pdf Simulation of magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) flows: electric potential formulation

deals with International Thermonuclear Exerimental Reactor

Thank you to both elvis and Linse , for the quick helpful replies.
That link was useful. But sir, it deals with the liquid metals.
The MHD theory of liquid metals (used as coolant and flows outside of the tokamak blanket) is different in many respects from the plasma inside the tokamak. Fusion plasmas are high temperature plasmas (~10^8 degree C). Although the MHD equations to be solved for tokamak plasmas are not very different than those are used in MHD of liquid metals.
this wiki link Would show the Eqns
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics

Since nobody had applied so it in OF for fusion plasma that is why doubt came in my mind.
Still I some more information is requested
1) Would the use of OpemFOAM in liquid metals and plasma be similar ?
1) Is it possible to use some inbuilt module or one needs it to develope in OF ?

Thank you to both of you

Dinesh
Shoonya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2011, 09:08
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Elvis
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sindelfingen, Germany
Posts: 620
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 24
elvis will become famous soon enough
Dear Dimish,

http://www.extend-project.de/user-gr...ewgroup/groups
=>Category:Special Interest Groups Name: MHD flows
Description: Developing MHD compressible flow solver...
Created:
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
Creator:Carlos Xisto
Group Forum: MHD flows Group Forum I do not know how active this group is!

I am no OF expert, but there are examples of OF with other software http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...1-cantera.html

Last edited by elvis; October 18, 2011 at 09:28.
elvis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2011, 11:48
Default
  #8
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17
Shoonya is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by elvis View Post
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
Creator:Carlos Xisto
Group Forum: MHD flows Group Forum I do not know how active this group is!
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...1-cantera.html
Thank you again sir... I'll try to do mix with this group
Shoonya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2011, 10:39
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Mirko Vukovic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 159
Rep Power: 17
mirko is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinesh2n@gmail.com View Post
Hello,
I am curious about that is it possible to use OpenFOAM in fusion plasma? As fusion plasma has some different properties than cold plasma. It is collisionless and quasineutral. But under certian approximations it can be treated as fluid. So is it possible to develop code in OpenFOAM for simulation of such plasma in toroidal geometry?

thank you
Regards
Can you state the equations that you are trying to solve?
mirko is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2011, 11:27
Default
  #10
Member
 
Patricio Bohorquez
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jaén, Spain
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 17
pbohorquez is on a distinguished road
Have you tried BOUT++?: https://bout2011.llnl.gov/

It shares many points in common with OpenFOAM philosophy and is devoted to tokamak.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinesh2n@gmail.com View Post
I am doing PhD in Tokamak fusion plasma. I have seen that OF has been used for plasma Ark and liquid metal flows in tokamak Blankets. Now, if I think to use OF in tokamak plasma, and as you also pointed out the possibility as yes, I wish not to get lost in between.
Earlier I have worked on OF in a convection problem. it seems me that programmer's guide function would support the work, because the required function have been used in liquid metal flows, where MHD equations are solved. After all tokamk plasma also uses modified MHD equations. So my guess OF could be used for the same.
I request you please say something more on this. so that I could get better confirmation and start working on it. Your comments are welcome.

Thank you


thank you
Dinesh
pbohorquez is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2011, 12:59
Default
  #11
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17
Shoonya is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbohorquez View Post
Have you tried BOUT++?: https://bout2011.llnl.gov/

It shares many points in common with OpenFOAM philosophy and is devoted to tokamak.
Sir, you are exactly right. There was an statement of Dr. Dudson that BOUT++ and OpenFOAM are somewhat similar (http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.5757), except that BOUT++ works in general coordinates (field-aligned) system whereas OF only works for Cartesian coordinates. So, my question arose from that.
I thought to request for BOUT++ code to Dr. Dudson and Prof. Xu, but my supervisor suggested me to develop my own code. So, I am trying myself and I do not use BOUT++, however I am aware of this.
Do you work in BOUT++? As you are professor and having understanding of fusion plasma, you must be knowing about this question better. Kindly help me in resolving the question that should I try to develop separately the code or use OF for the code development for tokamak plasma. I also wish to know your areas of interests/research in fusion plasma and email address.

thank you sir
regards
Dinesh
my email: dinesh2n@gmail.com
Shoonya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2011, 13:23
Default
  #12
Member
 
Patricio Bohorquez
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jaén, Spain
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 17
pbohorquez is on a distinguished road
I'm sorry but my topic is fluid mechanics, not plasma. So I can just inform you that the code is available at https://github.com/bendudson/BOUT-1.0/wiki and that the programming style seems similar. There is a lot of info to download at the workshop agenda. You can have a look at Bout++ examples and also at OpenFOAM applications to elect or compare both.
pbohorquez is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2011, 13:33
Default
  #13
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kanpur, India
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17
Shoonya is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirko View Post
Can you state the equations that you are trying to solve?
Dear sir,

Roughly, the Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics equation are in following wiki link : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics
In actual case i.e. in Toroidal geometry, the magnetic field has a complicated topology and can not be described by the Cartesian coordinates. Hence the various operators nabla, Laplcian and other discritization have to be done/defined in so called flux coordinates (http://www-fusion.ciemat.es/fusionwi...ux_coordinates).
These are different then cylindrical and spherical coordinates and are suitable only for a tokamak plasma.

After posting this question I came to realise that if OF only works in Cartesian and the operators/functions are defined in that way then it would not be possible to use OF for tokamak plasma. I might be wrong if you have better idea please suggest.
i.e. Question: Can we redefine operator/function of OF for our purpose. If so then why one would do it in OF, shouldn't he do separate coding.?

I also want to say that in tokmak blanket case OF works because the liquid metal coolant flows around the tokamak in channel geometry where Cartesian operators/functions work.

request for the further comments

thank you

Dinesh
Shoonya is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
fusion, plasma


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 wyldckat OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 3 September 8, 2010 07:25
OPENFOAM for Plasma Modelling masspec OpenFOAM 1 May 22, 2010 08:00
Modified OpenFOAM Forum Structure and New Mailing-List pete Site News & Announcements 0 June 29, 2009 06:56
OpenFOAM Debian packaging current status problems and TODOs oseen OpenFOAM Installation 9 August 26, 2007 14:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00.